[DCCP]: Add protection against invalid parameters to TFRC routines

 1) For the forward X_calc lookup, it 
    * protects effectively against RTT=0 (this case is possible), by
      returning the maximal lookup value instead of just setting it to 1
    * reformulates the array-bounds exceeded condition: this only happens
      if p is greater than 1E6 (due to the scaling)
    * the case of negative indices can now with certainty be excluded, 
      since documentation shows that the formulas are within bounds
    * additional protection against p = 0 (would give divide-by-zero)

 2) For the reverse lookup, it warns against
    * protects against exceeding array bounds
    * now returns 0 if f(p) = 0, due to function definition
    * warns about minimal resolution error and returns the smallest table
      value instead of p=0 [this would mask congestion conditions]

Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 net/dccp/ccids/lib/tfrc_equation.c |   33 +++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

--- a/net/dccp/ccids/lib/tfrc_equation.c
+++ b/net/dccp/ccids/lib/tfrc_equation.c
@@ -588,22 +588,19 @@ u32 tfrc_calc_x(u16 s, u32 R, u32 p)
        u32 f;
        u64 tmp1, tmp2;
 
+       /* check against invalid parameters and divide-by-zero   */
+       BUG_ON(p >  1000000);           /* p must not exceed 100%   */
+       BUG_ON(p == 0);                 /* f(0) = 0, divide by zero */
+       if(R == 0) {                    /* possible  divide by zero */
+               DCCP_CRIT("WARNING: RTT is 0, returning maximum X_calc.");
+               return ~0U;
+       }
+
        if (p < TFRC_CALC_X_SPLIT)                    /* 0      <= p <  0.05  */
                index = (p / (TFRC_CALC_X_SPLIT / TFRC_CALC_X_ARRSIZE)) - 1;
        else                                          /* 0.05   <= p <= 1.00  */
                index = (p / (1000000 / TFRC_CALC_X_ARRSIZE)) - 1;
 
-       if (index < 0)
-               /* p should be 0 unless there is a bug in my code */
-               index = 0;
-
-       if (R == 0) {
-               DCCP_WARN("RTT==0, setting to 1\n");
-               R = 1; /* RTT can't be zero or else divide by zero */
-       }
-
-       BUG_ON(index >= TFRC_CALC_X_ARRSIZE);
-
        if (p >= TFRC_CALC_X_SPLIT)
                f = tfrc_calc_x_lookup[index][0];
        else
@@ -633,13 +630,21 @@ u32 tfrc_calc_x_reverse_lookup(u32 fvalu
        int ctr = 0;
        int small;
 
-       if (fvalue < tfrc_calc_x_lookup[0][1])
+       if (fvalue == 0)        /* f(p) = 0  whenever  p = 0 */
                return 0;
 
+       /* Error cases. */
+       if (fvalue < tfrc_calc_x_lookup[0][1]) {
+               DCCP_WARN("fvalue %d smaller than resolution\n", fvalue);
+               return tfrc_calc_x_lookup[0][1];
+       }
+       if (fvalue > tfrc_calc_x_lookup[TFRC_CALC_X_ARRSIZE - 1][0]) {
+               DCCP_WARN("fvalue %d exceeds bounds!\n", fvalue);
+               return 1000000;
+       }
+
        if (fvalue <= tfrc_calc_x_lookup[TFRC_CALC_X_ARRSIZE - 1][1])
                small = 1;
-       else if (fvalue > tfrc_calc_x_lookup[TFRC_CALC_X_ARRSIZE - 1][0])
-               return 1000000;
        else
                small = 0;
 
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to