On 12/19/06, Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| @@ -384,6 +384,9 @@ static void ccid3_hc_tx_packet_sent(struct sock *sk, int
more,
| packet->dccphtx_rtt = hctx->ccid3hctx_rtt;
| packet->dccphtx_sent = 1;
| hctx->ccid3hctx_idle = 0;
| +
| + ccid3_pr_debug("seqno = %llu, rtt = %u\n",
| + (long long unsigned)packet->dccphtx_seqno, packet->dccphtx_rtt);
| }
Is this statement really necessary - both values appear somewhere else and
neither is specific
to ccid3_hc_tx_packet_sent.
I think it is useful. Nowhere else in the send path do we print out
which packet we are sending!
| @@ -158,6 +158,7 @@ enum ccid3_hc_rx_states {
| * @ccid3hcrx_s - Received packet size in bytes
| * @ccid3hcrx_pinv - Inverse of Loss Event Rate (RFC 4342, sec. 8.5)
| * @ccid3hcrx_elapsed_time - Time since packet reception
| + * @ccid3hcrx_seq_recalc_loss - when to recalc loss due to non-loss
Would it be possible to use a reference to the RFC section here - the entry is
slightly confusing.
Have done. Will be resending patch soon.
Ian
--
Web: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4
Blog: http://imcdnzl.blogspot.com
WAND Network Research Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
