Quoting Ian McDonald:
|  I'll look at this when I get a chance (hopefully today).

I will be out in a minute. I have few more things:

 (a) On
     
http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gerrit/dccp/patch-backlog/3c_CCID3_add_more_debugging_McDonald.diff
     I made minor changes (to make the format consistent)

 (b) On my `experimental' patch set I have uploaded the following:
     
     
http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gerrit/dccp/experimental_patches/EXPERIMENTAL_dummy_receiver.diff

     This short-circuits the feedback loop (when working as an electronics 
engineer,
     opening or short-circuiting was the first method of testing something when 
there
     was a fault). Using this patch, one can test if the sender `behaves', 
since the
     receiver practically does not impose inhibitions.

 (c) Thought again about dccp_wait_for_ccid -- is it certain that when the 
packet is ready
     to be sent (ccid_hc_tx_send_packet returns 0), that it indeed will be sent 
soon?
     I might ponder this when on holiday B-)

Best wishes
Gerrit
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to