But the two bit patterns are the same, and the comparison will promote
them both to unsigned.
Try running the following program:
int main (int c, char **v)
{
if (~0 != ~0U)
printf("not equal as unknown");
if ((int) ~0 != (int) ~0U)
printf("not equal as ints");
if ((unsigned) ~0 != (unsigned) ~0U)
printf("not equal as unsigneds");
if ((int) ~0 != (unsigned) ~0U)
printf("not equal as int/unsigned");
if ((unsigned) ~0 != (int) ~0U)
printf("not equal as unsigned/int");
}
It prints nothing.
If one of the two numbers is 64-bit, your analysis works. Maybe I'm
missing something but I don't think so...
Eddie
Ian McDonald wrote:
On 1/5/07, Eddie Kohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ian (catching up slowly slowly), here is a nit as nitty as they come.
This diff seems strange to me, since ~ actually does the same thing on
integers and unsigned integers. (This code:
printf("%u %u\n", ~0, ~0U);
will print the same thing twice.)
Perhaps dccplih_interval is a 64-bit number? In which case you want to
say something like ~0ULL?
Eddie
Printing gives them the same result as you are using a %u mask. If you
do it with a %d mask you will get a different result.
And that is the issue dccp_lih_interval is unsigned 32 bit and ~0 is a
signed number and is large negative and they therefore can't be equal.
Ian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
