Due to the following reasons:
1) The race condition is not tackled. As before, you allow several routines
running
asynchronously in software interrupts (timer interrupt, net backlog
softirq) and
in user context (dccp_sendmsg) to write/read on t_nom. Without locking, you
will
have the race condition that one routine performs a write (e.g. sub_usecs)
while
another performs a read and sends the packet to early.
2) It introduces new problems / BUGs that did not previously exist - please
see inline.
3) By removing t_ipi you are now recalculating it each time a packet is sent -
which is
far more expensive then only recomputing it when related data changes. This
will
indeed contribute to slow-down.
I am not in support of this patch. This patch is against _working_ code.
Instead of solving
problems, it introduces new ones.
Can I suggest that we spent our time more profitably on fixing the many bugs
that exist?
Fix broken, not working code.
| We are calculating t_nom in the past we have made it far too complicated
| and not matching the RFC.
What made you come to this conclusion?
| @@ -275,11 +266,10 @@ static void ccid3_hc_tx_no_feedback_timer(unsigned
long data)
| ccid3_hc_tx_update_x(sk, &now);
| }
| /*
| - * Schedule no feedback timer to expire in
| - * max(t_RTO, 2 * s/X) = max(t_RTO, 2 * t_ipi)
| + * Schedule no feedback timer to expire in t_RTO
| * See comments in packet_recv() regarding the value of t_RTO.
| */
| - t_nfb = max(hctx->ccid3hctx_t_rto, 2 * hctx->ccid3hctx_t_ipi);
| + t_nfb = hctx->ccid3hctx_t_rto;
| break;
| case TFRC_SSTATE_NO_SENT:
| DCCP_BUG("%s(%p) - Illegal state NO_SENT", dccp_role(sk), sk);
| @@ -337,13 +327,13 @@ static int ccid3_hc_tx_send_packet(struct sock *sk,
struct sk_buff *skb)
| hctx->ccid3hctx_x = hctx->ccid3hctx_s;
| hctx->ccid3hctx_x <<= 6;
|
| - /* First timeout, according to [RFC 3448, 4.2], is 1 second */
| - hctx->ccid3hctx_t_ipi = USEC_PER_SEC;
| /* Initial delta: minimum of 0.5 sec and t_gran/2 */
| hctx->ccid3hctx_delta = TFRC_OPSYS_HALF_TIME_GRAN;
|
| /* Set t_0 for initial packet */
| + /* First timeout, according to [RFC 3448, 4.2], is 1 second */
| hctx->ccid3hctx_t_nom = now;
| + timeval_add_usecs(&hctx->ccid3hctx_t_nom, USEC_PER_SEC);
BUG: The first packet will be delayed for 1 second instead of being sent
immediately as specified
in RFC 3448, 4.6.
| break;
| case TFRC_SSTATE_NO_FBACK:
| case TFRC_SSTATE_FBACK:
| @@ -361,6 +351,7 @@ static int ccid3_hc_tx_send_packet(struct sock *sk,
struct sk_buff *skb)
| return delay / 1000L;
|
| ccid3_hc_tx_update_win_count(hctx, &now);
| + ccid3_update_send_time(hctx);
Recalculating t_ipi, t_delta, and t_nom each time a packet is sent - very
expensive.
| @@ -486,6 +474,7 @@ static void ccid3_hc_tx_packet_recv(struct sock *sk,
struct sk_buff *skb)
| hctx->ccid3hctx_x = scaled_div(w_init << 6,
r_sample);
| hctx->ccid3hctx_t_ld = now;
|
| + timeval_sub_usecs(&hctx->ccid3hctx_t_nom, USEC_PER_SEC);
| ccid3_update_send_time(hctx);
|
| ccid3_pr_debug("%s(%p), s=%u, MSS=%u, w_init=%u, "
Why this complicated code - it was simpler before. Now you first add 1 second,
then send the packet
immediately and then you subtract again.
| @@ -539,11 +528,7 @@ static void ccid3_hc_tx_packet_recv(struct sock *sk,
struct sk_buff *skb)
| hctx->ccid3hctx_t_rto = max_t(u32, 4 * hctx->ccid3hctx_rtt,
| CONFIG_IP_DCCP_CCID3_RTO *
| (USEC_PER_SEC/1000));
| - /*
| - * Schedule no feedback timer to expire in
| - * max(t_RTO, 2 * s/X) = max(t_RTO, 2 * t_ipi)
| - */
| - t_nfb = max(hctx->ccid3hctx_t_rto, 2 * hctx->ccid3hctx_t_ipi);
| + t_nfb = hctx->ccid3hctx_t_rto;
|
| ccid3_pr_debug("%s(%p), Scheduled no feedback timer to "
| "expire in %lu jiffies (%luus)\n",
BUG: This removes conformance with RFC 3448, section 4.3 and section 4.4.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
