| > I have a snapshot which illustrates this state:
| >
| >
http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gerrit/dccp/dccp_probe/examples/no_tx_locking/transmit_rate.png
| >
| > The oscillating behaviour is well visible. In contrast, I am sure that you
would agree that the
| > desirable state is the following:
| >
| >
http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gerrit/dccp/dccp_probe/examples/with_tx_locking/transmit_rate.png
| >
|
| Questions on the graphs:
| - are these direct connect nodes?
The nodes are on the same Ethernet LAN, connected via 100Mbps / 1GBps
interfaces. There is no
other traffic on that LAN.
| - why is Xcalc 0?
Since no losses occurred (p is always 0 on these tests).
| - why on the stable one is Xrecv different from X. Is X the rate that
| it is allowed to send at but doesn't so only achieves Xrecv?
When there is no loss, X = max(min(2*X, 2*X_recv), s/R) - the graph agrees with
this, since
X is about 2*X_recv.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
