On 3/12/07, Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have put quite a lot of work into * bringing CCID 3 up to spec * implement loss detection according to RFC 3448/4342 * add loss intervals handling according to rfc3448bis * many cool new features * ample documentation, applications, and test modules for most featuresHowever, since patches are small for review-ability, this amounts to a total of 75 patches, including the patch backlog; please see suggestion (2). 1. PREVIEW: Since mostly the following files are modified: net/dccp/ccids/lib/ccid3.* net/dccp/ccids/lib/loss_interval.* net/dccp/ccids/lib/packet_history.* I have posted combined patches onto http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gerrit/dccp/patches_working-set/ These apply in-order (see series file) onto today's tree. They have been extensively tested, can offer a test module for most essential features. 2. SUGGESTION: Since the patch backlog is really quite old now (over 2 months), I would like to suggest to re-submit it as one, combined patch, in the format of http://www.erg.abdn.ac.uk/users/gerrit/dccp/patches_working-set/01_The_Patch_Backlog.diff (maybe a bit more verbose) ==> But this depends on whether people are ok with this (see (3))
No, what I think is the best to do is to consider your patch backlog as a separate git tree that now will be pulled, preserving the changesets history. - Arnaldo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
