On 4/20/07, Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ian, I would appreciate if in future you would not copy patch
descriptions over from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Apart from the fact that I don't like it, this creates the wrong idea among
people who have little or nothing to do with actual protocol implementation
- it produces an impression of "let's talk about some implementation bugs".
(But competent implementation feedback is welcome and solicited on [EMAIL
PROTECTED])
Which is the more regrettable since you are right in raising this point
as a general one: it is indeed a limitation of [RFC 3448, 4.6] with regard
to non-realtime OSes. To clarify, the two main issues of this limitation
are summarised below.
Yes I was a bit lazy in replying without changing the subject etc. My apologies.
I'm refraining on replying further on these topics until I do some
experimentation which may be a while off.
Ian
--
Web: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/
Blog: http://iansblog.jandi.co.nz
WAND Network Research Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
