On 5/25/07, Burak Gorkemli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Ian,
Hi Burak, Adding DCCP @ vger as I think you mistakenly added DCCP @ ietf to the mailing...
Last but not the least, I have discovered that I am having some trouble with the sizes of the packets sent. When the packet sizes are equal to each other - which is not the actual case in my tests - everything goes fine. However, when they are not, DCCP behaves strangely, it halts for some period of time during the stream - I think due to the mismatch between the sizes of the packets sent and the average packet size used in the TCP equation. I must confess that I am not aggregating smaller packets into larger ones - which is the next thing that I will do - but I was not expecting such a big effect. I will post the test results later, as I implement packet aggregation.
CCID3 in Linux keeps a moving average of the packet size. If you look at the TFRC equation the rate = some numbers / packet size. In effect CCID3 therefore becomes rate limited by packets per second as it does not perform packet aggregation within the protocol (unlike TCP). This would explain your results in this regard. Ian -- Web: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/ Blog: http://iansblog.jandi.co.nz WAND Network Research Group - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
