On 6/4/07, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/3/07, Ian McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This removes dccp_li_hist_entry_delete as it's not used anywhere.
Yes, it is not being used, question is if it should be removed or if
we have to convert the open coded calls to
kmem_cache_free(dccp_li_cachep, entry) to use it, I think we should
use it, its the logical counterpart to dccp_li_hist_entry_new.
That or we kill also dccp_li_entry_new and use kmem_cache_alloc where
it is being used now. I prefer to keep both.
- Arnaldo
OK. Will rework in that way.
Ian
--
Web: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/
Blog: http://iansblog.jandi.co.nz
WAND Network Research Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
