On 7/20/07, Patrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Applying only patch #1 doesn't work... patch #2 correct the error.
PerfSocket.cpp: In function 'void MakeSocket(thread_Settings*)':
PerfSocket.cpp:89: error: 'IPPROTO_UDPLITE' was not declared in this scope
make[2]: *** [PerfSocket.o] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/root/iperf-2.0.2/src'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/root/iperf-2.0.2'
make: *** [all] Error 2
It could be good to not have 2 iperf dccp patched version, one Ian
patched, one Gerrit patched ?
I agree. I think only thing missing from Gerrit's is my continuous
patch which should apply on top of his I'm guessing.
I might just go do some iperf hacking now and see what I can find...
Ian
--
Web: http://wand.net.nz/~iam4/
Blog: http://iansblog.jandi.co.nz
WAND Network Research Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
