Em Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 10:04:22AM +0100, Gerrit Renker escreveu: > Quoting Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo: > | > --- a/net/dccp/options.c > | > +++ b/net/dccp/options.c > | > @@ -160,7 +160,7 @@ int dccp_parse_options(struct sock *sk, > | > if (len != 4) > | > goto out_invalid_option; > | > > | > - tse = dreq? &dreq->dreq_tstamp : dp->dccps_tstamp; > | > + tse = dreq? &dreq->dreq_tstamp : &dp->dccps_tstamp; > | > | And here you fix it in an unrelated patch, tsc, tsc :-)
> These kind of errors don't happen on purpose, if I submitted everything as > one big patch > no one would notice. But with one problem split into several tens of patches > it easily > happens that one hunk is fixed while quilt is in a different patch - and then > it gets assigned > the wrong patch. I missed this hunk so thank you two for spotting this - it > is fixed now. Thanks! Dave pulled the first 6 patches I merged from you and has rebased 2.6.24, I'll follow suit, apply the ones I already have here and continue the review/test process. - Arnaldo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
