[DCCP]: Basic data structure for feature negotiation

For implementing an improved DCCP feature negotiation, data structures are 
provided:
        * a container for the various (SP or NN) values,
        * symbolic state names to track feature states,
        * an entry struct which holds all current information together,
        * elementary functions to fill in and process these structures.

Entry structs are arranged as a FIFO for the following reason: RFC 4340 
specifies that
if multiple options of the same type are present, they are processed in the 
order of
their appearance in the packet; which means that this order needs to be 
preserved in the
local data structure (the later insertion code also respects this order).

The struct list_head has been chosen for the following reasons: the most 
frequent operations are
 * add new entry at tail (when receiving Change or setting socket options);
 * delete entry (when Confirm has been received);
 * deep copy of entire list (when cloning from listening socket onto request 
socket).

I am wondering whether struct list_head is `too fat' for a request socket, but 
have kept this
structure since it lead to simpler code. If structure sizes are an issue, I'd 
be willing to 
convert to singly-linked list later if necessary (but it would need a tail 
pointer).

The NN value has been set to 64 bit, which is a currently sufficient upper 
limit (Sequence Window 
feature has 48 bit).

Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
 net/dccp/feat.c |   50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 net/dccp/feat.h |   60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 110 insertions(+)

--- a/net/dccp/feat.h
+++ b/net/dccp/feat.h
@@ -14,6 +14,66 @@
 #include <linux/types.h>
 #include "dccp.h"
 
+enum dccp_feat_type {
+       FEAT_AT_RX   = 1,       /* located at RX side of half-connection  */
+       FEAT_AT_TX   = 2,       /* located at TX side of half-connection  */
+       FEAT_SP      = 4,       /* server-priority reconciliation (6.3.1) */
+       FEAT_NN      = 8,       /* non-negotiable reconciliation (6.3.2)  */
+       FEAT_UNKNOWN = 0xFF     /* not understood or invalid feature      */
+};
+
+enum dccp_feat_state {
+       FEAT_DEFAULT = 0,       /* using default values from 6.4 */
+       FEAT_INITIALISING,      /* feature is being initialised  */
+       FEAT_CHANGING,          /* Change sent but not confirmed yet */
+       FEAT_UNSTABLE,          /* local modification in state CHANGING */
+       FEAT_STABLE             /* both ends (think they) agree */
+};
+
+/**
+ * dccp_feat_val  -  Container for SP or NN feature values
+ * @nn:     single NN value
+ * @sp.vec: single SP value plus optional preference list
+ * @sp.len: length of @sp.vec in bytes
+ */
+typedef union {
+       u64 nn;
+       struct {
+               u8      *vec;
+               u8      len;
+       }   sp;
+} dccp_feat_val;
+
+/**
+ * struct feat_entry  -  Data structure to perform feature negotiation
+ * @feat_num: one of %dccp_feature_numbers
+ * @val: feature's current value (SP features may have preference list)
+ * @state: feature's current state
+ * @needs_mandatory: whether Mandatory options should be sent
+ * @needs_confirm: whether to send a Confirm instead of a Change
+ * @empty_confirm: whether to send an empty Confirm (depends on @needs_confirm)
+ * @is_local: feature location (1) or feature-remote (0)
+ * @node: list pointers, entries arranged in FIFO order
+ */
+struct dccp_feat_entry {
+       u8                      feat_num;
+       dccp_feat_val           val;
+       enum dccp_feat_state    state:8;
+       bool                    needs_mandatory:1,
+                               needs_confirm:1,
+                               empty_confirm:1,
+                               is_local:1;
+
+       struct list_head        node;
+};
+
+static inline u8 dccp_feat_genopt(struct dccp_feat_entry *entry)
+{
+       if (entry->needs_confirm)
+               return entry->is_local? DCCPO_CONFIRM_L : DCCPO_CONFIRM_R;
+       return entry->is_local? DCCPO_CHANGE_L : DCCPO_CHANGE_R;
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_IP_DCCP_DEBUG
 extern const char *dccp_feat_typename(const u8 type);
 extern const char *dccp_feat_name(const u8 feat);
--- a/net/dccp/feat.c
+++ b/net/dccp/feat.c
@@ -23,6 +23,56 @@
 
 #define DCCP_FEAT_SP_NOAGREE (-123)
 
+/* copy constructor, fval must not already contain allocated memory */
+static int dccp_feat_clone_sp_val(dccp_feat_val *fval, u8 const *val, u8 len)
+{
+       fval->sp.len = len;
+       if (fval->sp.len > 0) {
+               fval->sp.vec = kmemdup(val, len, gfp_any());
+               if (fval->sp.vec == NULL) {
+                       fval->sp.len = 0;
+                       return -ENOBUFS;
+               }
+       }
+       return 0;
+}
+
+static void dccp_feat_val_destructor(u8 feat_num, dccp_feat_val *val)
+{
+       if (val && dccp_feat_type(feat_num) == FEAT_SP)
+               kfree(val->sp.vec);
+}
+
+static struct dccp_feat_entry *
+             dccp_feat_clone_entry(struct dccp_feat_entry const *original)
+{
+       struct dccp_feat_entry *new;
+       u8 type = dccp_feat_type(original->feat_num);
+
+       if (type == FEAT_UNKNOWN)
+               return NULL;
+
+       new = kmemdup(original, sizeof(struct dccp_feat_entry), gfp_any());
+       if (new == NULL)
+               return NULL;
+
+       if (type == FEAT_SP && dccp_feat_clone_sp_val(&new->val,
+                                                     original->val.sp.vec,
+                                                     original->val.sp.len)) {
+               kfree(new);
+               return NULL;
+       }
+       return new;
+}
+
+static void dccp_feat_entry_destructor(struct dccp_feat_entry *entry)
+{
+       if (entry != NULL) {
+               dccp_feat_val_destructor(entry->feat_num, &entry->val);
+               kfree(entry);
+       }
+}
+
 int dccp_feat_change(struct dccp_minisock *dmsk, u8 type, u8 feature,
                     u8 *val, u8 len, gfp_t gfp)
 {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to