On 10/10/07, Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [DCCP]: More informative state names > > This realises a naming scheme due to Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo (many thanks), > which > assigns more informative/declarative names to the auxiliary and intermediate > states > PASSIVE_1/2i - which exist to facilitate passive-Close: > > s/PASSIVE_1/DCCP_PASSIVE_CLOSE/g; /* any node receiving a Close > */ > s/PASSIVE_2/DCCP_PASSIVE_CLOSEREQ/g; /* when client receives > CloseReq */ > > In addition, to better separate between sending and receiving a CloseReq, > > s/CLOSEREQ/DCCP_ACTIVE_CLOSEREQ/g; /* server sending a CloseReq > */ > > However, for pretty-printing and system logs, the name of the last state > remains > at `CLOSEREQ', for consistency. > > Signed-off-by: Gerrit Renker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Signed-off-by: Ian McDonald <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
