I have a question/suggestion for DCCP/CCID field names, which have a tendency
to grow
into really_quite_long_strings. The convention for field members seems to be
"x"->"x"_<fieldname>
Examples are in particular
* hctx->ccid2hctx_<fieldname>
* hcrx->ccid3hcrx_<fieldname>
* avr->dccpavr_<fieldname>
* av->dccpav_<fieldname>
The problem is that this naming convention has no apparent benefits:
* which struct is used is evident from the context and need not be encoded
* someone reading the code is only interested in the fieldnames
* with the line length limit of 80 characters this convention almost
inevitably leads to
multi-line expression for even the simplest kinds of comparisons and
expressions.
Hence my suggestion is to reduce the replicated "x" field prefix, so that field
members become
shorter, as will be expressions, and the code would be easier to read.
What is the opinion of other developers / maintainer regarding this?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
