Em Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 09:59:14AM +0000, Gerrit Renker escreveu:
> I have a suggestion regarding types, names, and things shared between
> CCID3 and CCID4 via dccp_tfrc_lib:
>
> I think it would be best to name all such shared structures / names,
> when they are to appear in the dccp_tfrc_lib, as `tfrc_xxx' instead of
> `ccid34_xxx'
>
> For example,
>
> enum tfrc_fback_type {
> // ...
> };
>
> instead of:
>
> | enum ccid34_fback_type {
> | + FBACK_NONE = 0,
> | + FBACK_INITIAL,
> | + FBACK_PERIODIC,
> | + FBACK_PARAM_CHANGE
> | +};
>
> There are no mechanisms other than TFRC (current work builds around TFRC,
> rather than entirely new schemes)
> so I think that this naming scheme is safe; and it would be consistent
> throughout the library.
>
> I'd hope that Arnaldo and Ian add their take if they disagree or have other
> suggestions.
I agree that for things which concept comes from TFRC and are used in
one of the TFRC based DCCP CCIDs the best possible namespace is tfrc_.
If not we'll have to rename everything again when CCID5 comes if it is
also based on TFRC 8-)
And after all, even before ccid4 appeared on the radar I created
dccp_tfrc_lib, include/linux/tfrc.h, etc exactly for sharing code with
potentially new CCIDs that were based on TFRC.
- Arnaldo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe dccp" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
