On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Thomas Dudziak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sorry to bother you again with some Gump stuff,
No problem.
> but I think there is something wrong with the Gump definition of
> commons-codec and/or DdlUtils. I checked the Gump definition of
> ddlutils (thanks for adding it btw.) and it correctly specifies a
> dependency to commons-codec.
Classic case of mid-flight collision. I changed the descriptor to
specify a dependency on codec less than an hour ago, so you are
looking at a descriptor that is newer than the one used during the
last Gump run.
It should work fine with the next run.
Cheers
Stefan
