On 4/27/06, Philip Dodds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll rebuild from head, I was using a version from Feb :)
That should have worked back then (it actually dates back to the commons-sql time). But it can't hurt to update anyway. > Is there any plans to extend DDL Utils to allow other types of DB object to > be handled (ie. PL/SQL/functions/procedures/triggers etc) As far as it makes sense/is possible in a database-independent way, yes. Tom
