On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 4:24 AM, Rijk van Haaften <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a (good?) reason for this: > Table.findColumn(String) > Table.findIndex(String) > but > Table.findForeignKey(ForeignKey) The reason is that foreign keys are not required to have a name. However, you're right, there is no reason to not provide a findForeignKey method that takes a name for easier access to foreign keys that have a name (feel free to create a JIRA issue for this). Tom
