These emails are the latest postings in accord with what sounds like
a resounding preference to limit posting capability to people who are
list members.  This would likely mean a few potential contributors
wouldn't bother BUT it might also mean we would see far less spam.

Unless there are vociferous objections to such a plan, I submit that
Mark Kraitchman be asked to enable that "filtering" functionality for
the mailing list.


--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> DeadLists Digest           Saturday, 11 May 2002       Volume 02 :
> Number 562
> 
> In this issue:
> 
>       Spam
>       Re:  Spam
> 
> See the end of the digest for information on subscribing to the
> DeadLists
> or DeadLists-Digest mailing lists and on how to retrieve back
> issues.
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> From: "Darren E. Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 21:21:50 -0400
> Subject: Spam
> 
> As a "data point", I have received literally 20 spam emails / virus
> alerts
> *today*.  WTF?
> 
> DM
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> From: Jim Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 18:51:15 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: Re:  Spam
> 
> That's nothing.  I had 42 messages in my e-mail this morning. 
> Among them
> were 17 spams and 17 virus or worm alerts.  I really think it's
> time to do
> something about this with the list.  If limiting posts to
> subscribers will
> do it, let's go for it. 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> End of DeadLists Digest V2 #562
> *******************************


=====
nathan underscore wolfson at yahoo dot com
nathan underscore wolfson at alumni dot reed dot edu

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com

Reply via email to