> thanks. I thought about this as a kind of fall back option but was > hoping not to have M_y as a part of > a BlockSparse but to be honest I am sure it will work perfectly.
Sure, you could also just call the function with no coefficient and pass it a block sparse matrix. The block you want is then mass_matrix.block(0,0) W. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wolfgang Bangerth email: [email protected] www: http://www.math.tamu.edu/~bangerth/ _______________________________________________ dealii mailing list http://poisson.dealii.org/mailman/listinfo/dealii
