> On 8 Aug 2016, at 22:38, Wolfgang Bangerth <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 08/08/2016 02:18 PM, Denis Davydov wrote: >> >> However, when I changed the partition into something like >> { 0, 2, 4, ... } , { 1, 3, 5, ... } >> it fails, which makes me believe that non-contiguous partitions are >> not (completely) supported by dealii or trilinos >> >> >> should be fine for Trilinos and deal.II. > > That shouldn't be a problem for storing matrices and vectors, and I suspect > also not for the iterative solvers. I'm not sure the direct solvers in > Trilinos can handle that, though. That should be relatively simple to find > out with a little test program, though.
Good point! I did not notice that direct solvers are used. Obviously for starters one could try iterative solver with non-contiguous range. If it works, then the issue is in Trilinos’s direct solvers. Regards, Denis. -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
