Hi, Bruno, Thanks for the prompt reply. I will try the implementation as you suggested, hope I can make it work with it. Otherwise, I will just go with brick elements, although the EM structure I can model may be limited.
Best Jianan 在 2017年12月20日星期三 UTC-5下午3:26:21，Bruno Turcksin写道： > > Jianan, > > 2017-12-20 14:54 GMT-05:00 Jianan Zhang <[email protected] <javascript:> > >: > >> >> What I am really expecting is that someone who has some experience of >> using FE_Nedelec to solve EM problems can give me some general advice. For >> example, can we use FE_Nedelec on a mesh imported from other mesh >> generators instead of the one generated from dealii itself? Or does dealii >> of the current version support this kind of mesh (obtained from Gmsh >> software and after transformed into hexahedrals) well? and so on and so >> forth. >> >> If someone can give me this kind of hint it will help a lot. Because the >> actual problem may be due to the not good support of non-rectangular meshes >> when using FE_Nedelec, and in that case my debugging is like a wast of time. >> > I don't follow closely what is happening with FE_Nedelec but it is > probably the worst finite element to work with in deal. Over the years, we > have found some subtle bugs in the implementation. My understanding is that > the current implementation will be replaced by this one > https://github.com/dealii/dealii/pull/2240 which should be a lot more > robust. If you suspect that the problem is in deal, you could try this > implementation. > > Best, > > Bruno > -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
