Would you mind sending us the "detailed.log" files?

Best,
Matthias


On Tue, Dec 26, 2017, at 12:35 CST, [email protected] wrote:

> Thanks. This is strange as I still get 15-20% consistently better results 
> in favor of older versions
>  on three different machines already. Two more studies on other systems 
> attached below.
>
> TEST: Step-23 (integration time modified from 5 to 150, output suppressed)
> CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE: "Release".
>
> MACHINE 1: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700K CPU @ 4.00GHz
> $ cat /etc/redhat-release
> CentOS Linux release 7.4.1708 (Core)
> $ gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-16)
>
> deal v8.1.0 (built and installed from source):
>
> $ time ./step-23
> real    1m23.768s
> user    5m46.080s
> sys    0m4.079s
>
> deal v8.5.1 (built and installed from source):
>
> $ time ./step-23
> real    1m42.416s
> user    5m37.018s
> sys    0m4.340s
>
> MACHINE 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5690  @ 3.47GHz
> $ lsb_release -a
> Description:    Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS
> $ gcc --version
> gcc (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04.3) 4.8.4
>
> deal v8.1.0 (built and installed from source):
>
> $ time ./step-23
> real    2m49.114s
> user    11m41.429s
> sys    0m48.882s
>
> deal v8.5.1 (built and installed from source):
> $ time ./step-23
> real    3m20.583s
> user    10m54.850s
> sys    2m18.989s
>
>
> On Tuesday, December 26, 2017 at 6:08:17 PM UTC+3, Matthias Maier wrote:
>>
>> Hi, 
>>
>> I get relatively comparable results for both versions: 
>>
>> dev: ./step-23  55.55s user 1.64s system 131% cpu 43.637 total 
>> 8.0: ./step-23  55.85s user 1.48s system 129% cpu 44.130 total 
>>
>> Is this the unmodified step-23 tutorial program? 
>>
>> For measuring performance regressions a total runtime of less than 5 
>> seconds doesn't say that much. Never versions allocate and precompute 
>> quite a bunch of stuff upfront which might result in a small (problem 
>> independent) fixed runtime overhead (of a second or less). 
>>
>> Best, 
>> Matthias 
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017, at 05:52 CST, [email protected] <javascript:> 
>> wrote: 
>>
>> > Deal.II 8.5.1 seems to be 20% slower than 8.0.0. This is the timing I 
>> get 
>> > when running the Step-23 tutorial (output to screen and vtk is 
>> suppressed): 
>> > 
>> > deal.II version 8.0.0: 
>> > 
>> > $ time ./step-23 
>> > Number of active cells: 16384 
>> > Number of degrees of freedom: 16641 
>> > 
>> > real    0m3.432s 
>> > user    0m6.320s 
>> > sys    0m0.612s 
>> > 
>> > deal.II version 8.5.1: 
>> > 
>> > $ time ./step-23 
>> > Number of active cells: 16384 
>> > Number of degrees of freedom: 16641 
>> > 
>> > real    0m4.430s 
>> > user    0m7.080s 
>> > sys    0m0.492s 
>> > 
>> > In general, I get about 20% slow down for my own code when upgrading 
>> from 
>> > 8.0.0 to 8.5.1. What is the reason of such a slow down? Does the deal.II 
>> > follow the right direction given new versions become gradually slower?! 
>>

-- 
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see 
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to