On 05/23/2018 10:29 PM, 'Maxi Miller' via deal.II User Group wrote:
Yes, I know, but at least the angle-dependent part can be neglected in my
case. Nevertheless, would switching the triangulation to a cylinder already
include that change? If yes, then I think the easiest way for me is to simply
switch the triangulation.
You'd have to deal with a 3d problem, though you can now pose it in Cartesian
coordinates.
But of course solving a 3d problem is MUCH more expensive than solving in 2d.
That's particularly annoying if you don't NEED to solve in 3d because you know
that your solution doesn't depend on the angle :-)
Best
W.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: [email protected]
www: http://www.math.colostate.edu/~bangerth/
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
