Dear Daniel, I have just been scratching around the surface so do not know which option works best. My primary objective was to recreate Step 51 in a distributed (mpi+p4est+petsc) setting and I was repeating, as far as possible, whatever was done in that tutorial. I can try the interpolate option and see how far I can go .... Thanks, Rochan
On Monday, December 24, 2018 at 3:32:10 AM UTC-6, Daniel Arndt wrote: > > rru, > > VectorTools::project_boundary_values doesn't work for > parallel::distributed::Triangulation objects yet. > We might change the implementation in the same way as we did for > VectorTools::project using the MatrixFree > framework in the future (earlier if someone wants to contribute). > Until then, VectorTools::interpolate_boundary_values should be able to be > used in most cases as a replacement. > Is there any reason why that is not a feasible alternative for you? > > Best, > Daniel > -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
