On 7/30/19 2:30 PM, Jean-Paul Pelteret wrote: > > Thanks for sharing! Those numbers are certainly thought provoking. It > would appear that we (being the collective community) have been putting > in a few minutes here and there to write this FEM library :-D
We might have :-) > The “bundled” folder includes third party libraries, so I think that it > would be disingenuous for one to include those contributions in such an > assessment of the size of the code base. But if you want to get the most > representative figures for the library itself, then the having a line > count for the “cmake”, “doc”, “include”, “examples” and “source” would > give the most accurate representation of the size of the functional part > of the library. We already know that there are on the order of 10000 > unit tests, so having an individual assessment of the “tests” folder > would be interesting. If you’re willing to re-run your analysis while > taking my comments into consideration, then I’d certainly be interested > to see the new results! There is actually a script in contrib/utilities/count_lines.sh that counts lines and also shows how to visualize the data. It would be interesting to use cloc for that script :-) Best W. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Wolfgang Bangerth email: [email protected] www: http://www.math.colostate.edu/~bangerth/ -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/bfd762e4-2dad-626e-5228-afb601786bc0%40colostate.edu.
