понедельник, 1 июня 2020 г., 6:14:49 UTC+3 пользователь Wolfgang Bangerth 
написал:
>
> On 5/29/20 9:42 AM, Alexey Ozeritskiy wrote: 
> > 
> > In step-35 we find u^{k+1} (diffusion step) 
> > Then we find \phi^{k+1} (projection step) and correct p^{k+1} pressure. 
> > But why we don't correct u^{k+1} velocity? I think u^{k+1} must be 
> solenoidal 
> > but it is not. 
>
> Alexey, 
> I'm not enough of an expert on projection methods, but you might want to 
> try 
> the review paper by Guermond from a few years ago to get some of the 
> background of these methods. I don't know whether u^{k+1} must be 
> solenoidal, 
> but it is quite possible that it doesn't have to be -- only that the 
> divergence is small (some power of h). 
>

Thanks, the answer is in the papers (Guermond, 1995, eq 5.11, Guermond, 
1998, eq 3.5). Actually we find and use non-solenoidal (intermediate) u^k 
on the diffusion step. 
"The _projected_ velocity can be completely _eliminated_ from the algorithm 
and the _intermediate_ velocity is the only one of interest." (Guermond, 
1998)
As I understand, we don't need the projected (solenoidal) velocity for the 
calculation.

 

>
> Best 
>   W. 
>
>
> -- 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 
> Wolfgang Bangerth          email:                 [email protected] 
> <javascript:> 
>                             www: http://www.math.colostate.edu/~bangerth/ 
>
>

-- 
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see 
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/50e15873-fdd9-45aa-b5a9-e7c1d6377e44%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to