Dear Wolfgang, Thanks for pointing out these tutorials. I will take a look.
Best regards, Diego Magela On Friday, October 8, 2021 at 6:44:55 PM UTC-3 Wolfgang Bangerth wrote: > On 10/8/21 2:19 PM, Diego Magela wrote: > > > > Yes, it is right. These are C^1 finite elements. > > These elements are difficult to implement. Maybe not for the 1d case, but > certainly for the 2d case. Have you taken a look at the existing step-47 > and > the new step-82 (in the dev version)? They show how one can work around > the > issues of C^1 elements by using regular Lagrange elements and ensuring C^1 > continuity in other ways. > > Shell and beam elements have, over the years, fallen out of favor in the > finite element community. That's because they are difficult to implement > on > unstructured meshes, and because alternative methods are no worse in > accuracy > and cost. > > Best > Wolfgang > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Wolfgang Bangerth email: [email protected] > www: http://www.math.colostate.edu/~bangerth/ > > -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/ea650054-5a35-4b01-aea6-52b94665d148n%40googlegroups.com.
