On 2/16/22 10:44, Uclus Heis wrote:
It seems this "solution.h5" instead of f_output was a misspelling mistake, I
have right f_output in my code. I can see that the problem here is that there
are processes without cells, which may be a bug of my implementation as I
would like to use all the processes. How does could that happen?
No, it's not a bug. If you have only 1 cell, for example, and you run on
multiple processes, then necessarily there are processes that own no cells.
The bug lies in the deal.II library:
https://github.com/dealii/dealii/issues/13404
Like I said, the VTU output writer works even in the case of empty processes.
Best
W.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: [email protected]
www: http://www.math.colostate.edu/~bangerth/
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/f2e5a968-1bff-3832-77c2-8efe225842d2%40colostate.edu.
