On 2/17/22 01:50, Мария Бронзова wrote:
I took the step-46 as an example for matching two physical domains, everything
works fine, apart from the interface boundary condition. In my case I need to
strongly enforce the continuity of the solid displacement vector. In other
words I need to set the solid displacements on the poro-elastic interface
equal to the displacements of the poroelastic media on the same interface.
Would you please give me a hint on how it can be best done? Would the
"constraints.add_line" function be still any help in this case?
That's one way. If you can identify which elastic degrees of freedom need to
match which poro-elastic degrees of freedom, then you can add continuity as a
constraint.
The alternative is to weakly enforce continuity of displacements in the same
way as DG formulations do, or as the Nitsche method does for boundary
conditions. This may be the easier approach, in particular if the finite
element spaces you use on both sides of the interface don't match.
Best
W.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wolfgang Bangerth email: [email protected]
www: http://www.math.colostate.edu/~bangerth/
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/78929b58-47d9-2d7f-2522-d2eda67d0966%40colostate.edu.
