Update -- the question had an obvious answer!

The reason for the discrepancy was simply the order of quadrature used.     
=D

Hopefully this can help someone else who is a beginner and thinking about 
something similar. 
Best regards, 
-Sean

On Tuesday, May 7, 2024 at 1:57:05 AM UTC-4 Sean Carney wrote:

> Hi all, 
>
> I am brand new to deal.II, so please excuse me if this question has an 
> obvious answer. 
> So far, I am quite enjoying the library and working through the different 
> Step tutorials. 
>
> I've been working through Step-47 and in particular am trying to better 
> understand the MeshWorker class. 
>
> In particular, I'm interested in using MeshWorker::mesh_loop to compute a 
> norm--this norm has integrals of jumps and averages over interior cell 
> faces. I know there is already an example in Step-82 that does just this. 
> However, if I understand correctly, the logic used in that example becomes 
> more challenging when using local refinement (which I'm aiming towards). 
> But MeshWorker handles the logic quite seamlessly, and (if I'm not 
> mistaken) automatically does it in parallel (this is just a bonus). 
>
> As a consistency check, I decided to use the MeshWorker class to compute 
> the L2 norm of my solution and compare it against the result using:
>
>     (1) VectorTools::integrate_difference and  
> VectorTools::compute_global_error (to be clear, I integrated the difference 
> between my computed solution and the zero function) 
>
> and 
>
>     (2) the method used in Step-82. 
>
> Note, the results from (1) and (2) agree with each other to 15 digits of 
> accuracy. However, the result from the MeshWorker method only agrees with 
> these two up to 6 digits of accuracy. 
>
> Is there any reason why this would be true? 
>
> To be clear, "the MeshWorker method" entails computing (the square root 
> of) u^T A u, where u is my computed solution and A is the matrix whose 
> entries correspond to the integrals of the i-th and j-th shape functions, 
> assembled with MeshWorker::mesh_loop.
>
> (Happy to post my code if it helps resolve the query, but for now wanted 
> to keep the post relatively clean.) 
>
> Thank you very much in advance for the assistance--
> Regards,
> -Sean
>

-- 
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see 
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/49290b4d-03e6-4d8c-89c5-50f6e3c5a1f1n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to