Thank you Prof. Bangerth for your time and very insightful suggestions. I'll definitely do more computational experiments and check literatures .
Best, Wayne 在2024年10月5日星期六 UTC+8 11:49:54<Wolfgang Bangerth> 写道： > On 10/4/24 21:44, 'yy.wayne' via deal.II User Group wrote: > > ** > > > > I decrease dt by half for each mesh refinement. Now the iterations remain > > constant (20, 21, and 23), same as you predicted. I guess in practical I > should > > keep dt and h constant (based on frequency and wave speed) for a > acceptable > > accuracy, while increase the dimension of computational space to test the > > number of iterations? > > I think you should do plenty of computational experiments to gain the > experience what works and what doesn't, and to assess the accuracy you > get! :-) > > Best > W. > > -- > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Wolfgang Bangerth email: [email protected] > www: http://www.math.colostate.edu/~bangerth/ > > > -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/043a66b3-e705-4ed7-8314-ed2a71a820f6n%40googlegroups.com.
