I'll add that I see step-70 as an example, which is time-dependent but does address the coupling process between a solid and fluid. Is that a good place to work from?
On Tuesday, October 8, 2024 at 12:55:50 PM UTC-4 Tim Braun wrote: > I am designing a study of elastic responses of structures underwater. An > important aspect in calculating vibration is the added mass (effect of > accelerating the incompressible fluid around the vibrating object). Instead > of using a transient FSI setup, I am seeking to solve the potential flow > around the object using a boundary element. The complexity of the boundary > element method is higher and utilizes "panels" while I want to stick to > linear or quadratic 3d finite elements for the structural elastic > deflection. I would only need the exterior faces to be transferred to the > BEM (not to be overly simplistic!) The calculation would need to be coupled > such that the potential flow solution updates the solid deflection shape > and visa versa. > > With all of that wind up, my question is what methods are available for > solving by passing solutions between two meshes or perhaps using a > connector to map one solution to the other? I suppose I could resort to > preCICE but imagine there's a way to run this within a deal ii "program". > > I hope my questions are somewhat clear enough, because I'm learning as I > go. Any first thoughts are appreciated > -- The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/ For mailing list/forum options, see https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/81680e84-0a0b-49d0-9706-94e679a2607fn%40googlegroups.com.
