On 12/2/25 20:47, Nihar Bhardwaj Darbhamulla wrote:
The reason for this partitioning is that the mesh undergoes computation in
phases. Given this partitioning, I am attempting to renumber dofs first by
Cutthill McKee followed by block wise renumbering. However on doing either
operation, my renumbering gets skewed with number of degrees of freedom far
exceeding the balance. I have attached the output of locally_owned_dofs()
below from each partition before and after renumbering. The number of dofs
associated with each block also appear to shuffle around. In this case, what
would be a viable way forward since my objective is to construct and use block
preconditioners for my problem.
Nihar:
I'm not entirely sure I understand what you see. It would probably help if you
created a small test case that showed how you ended up with the problem.
In any case, if I interpret things right, then you partition the mesh so that
the two halves have roughly equal number of cells. That's how it should be. Do
you have different numbers of degrees of freedom on cells, via the hp
framework? If so, you may of course get different numbers of DoFs on each
partition -- just because the number of cells in each partition is balanced
does not mean that the number of DoFs is balanced if cells have different
numbers of local DoFs. If that's not the case: How do you calculate the number
of DoFs owned by each partition?
Best
W.
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/7cb7432b-d27b-44be-aad3-d3db78a4fc4c%40colostate.edu.
