On 5/5/26 06:22, Praveen C wrote:
I am debugging some issue with a code which uses periodicity through
constraints.
I saw the function
make_consistent_in_parallel
https://dealii.org/current/doxygen/deal.II/
classAffineConstraints.html#ab0217a83250614a473e29096d9a7f515 <https://
nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?
url=https%3A%2F%2Fdealii.org%2Fcurrent%2Fdoxygen%2Fdeal.II%2FclassAffineConstraints.html%23ab0217a83250614a473e29096d9a7f515&data=05%7C02%7CWolfgang.Bangerth%40colostate.edu%7Cf143e6b5c17d444a18d508deaaa97288%7Cafb58802ff7a4bb1ab21367ff2ecfc8b%7C0%7C0%7C639135841918140020%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJFbXB0eU1hcGkiOnRydWUsIlYiOiIwLjAuMDAwMCIsIlAiOiJXaW4zMiIsIkFOIjoiTWFpbCIsIldUIjoyfQ%3D%3D%7C0%7C%7C%7C&sdata=Y6Ox6ymuK%2BBqmW37GR3qiOko2MNuIM9Ts0FnXNCBeTk%3D&reserved=0>
and it is only used in step-86. Should we use it always in a parallel code ?
Praveen:
yes, probably. If you only have hanging node constraints, I believe that the
result should already be consistent in parallel, but if you add constraints
manually, you probably want to call the function. It would certainly not hurt
to make it a habit to just *always* call the function when running in parallel
-- I would accept such a patch to the tutorial programs if you wanted to write
one.
Best
W.
--
The deal.II project is located at http://www.dealii.org/
For mailing list/forum options, see
https://groups.google.com/d/forum/dealii?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "deal.II User Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
To view this discussion visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/dealii/d0d226ed-4e8b-4121-97bb-994f0158a104%40colostate.edu.
