April 12


MISSOURI:

Prosecutor to seek death penalty in cocaine-injection slaying


A prosecutor said Tuesday that he will seek the death penalty for 2 people
accused of injecting a former Macon County prosecutor with a lethal dose
of cocaine.

The notice of intent was filed by Christian County Prosecutor Ron Cleek.

Thomas Naumann, 49, and Crystal Broyles, of Nixa, are both charged with
first-degree murder in the death of David Masters, 52. His body was found
last month along the James River.

Last week, Cleek dropped murder charges against Brandi Storment, 23, of
Springfield on in exchange for her full cooperation with investigators.

Investigators say Masters was confronted by housemates Broyles and Naumann
because he allegedly was 3 weeks behind on rent and had made unwanted
sexual advances toward Broyles.

Masters was killed after telling Broyles and Naumann he wanted to die of a
cocaine overdose instead of being shot. His body was found the next day,
with what a pathologist said was more than 40 times a lethal dose in his
system.

(source: Associated Press)






NEVADA:

Judge rejects recusal request


The judge set to preside over the new penalty hearing for a man who was
originally sentenced to death for the 1998 execution-style killings of 4
young men has decided not to recuse himself from the case over a potential
conflict of interest involving the judge's law clerk.

Chief Deputy District Attorney Robert Daskas on Friday filed an emergency
motion asking the Nevada Supreme Court to rule on whether District Judge
Lee Gates should be prohibited from handling Donte Johnson's
re-sentencing.

The reason: Gates' law clerk, Nancy Bernstein, was previously an intern in
the district attorney's office and worked on part of the prosecution's
case against Johnson.

On April 4, Daskas had asked Gates to recuse himself from the new penalty
phase scheduled to start April 19.

Gates took the issue under advisement, and on April 7 announced that he
had decided not to recuse himself from the case.

That prompted Daskas to seek a ruling from the state's highest court.

Johnson has stipulated he would not raise the issue in any future appeals
he files after his new penalty phase, but he could technically still raise
the issue as part of an ineffective counsel claim.

He could argue his attorneys were ineffective in advising him that no
conflict of interest existed to require Gates to recuse himself.

The Nevada Supreme Court ordered a new penalty phase for Johnson after the
U.S. Supreme Court ruled that only a jury could impose the death penalty.
A 3-judge panel had sentenced Johnson to death after the original jury
could not agree on the penalty.

Johnson was sentenced to death row by the three-judge panel for the
murders of Matthew Mowen, 19, Jeffrey Biddle, 19, Tracey Gorringer, 20,
and Peter Talamantez, 20. They were killed in August 1998 in a house they
had rented on Terra Linda Avenue in southeastern Las Vegas.

Johnson was aided in the killings by 24-year-old Terrell Cochise Young and
23-year-old Sikia Smith. Young and Smith were both sentenced to life in
prison for the shootings.

The Nevada Supreme Court, however, ordered a new trial for Young, saying
District Judge Joseph Pavlikowski failed to addresses Young's contention
that there was animosity and a lack of communication between the accused
killer and his court-appointed lawyer Lew Wolfbrandt at the 1999 trial.

Young made several motions to replace Wolfbrandt, but they were denied by
Pavlikowski. Young complained that Wolfbrandt failed to see him in jail
for 8 months.

Young's new trial is scheduled before District Judge Nancy Saitta on Sept.
12.

(source: Las Vegas Sun)






IOWA:

Jury selection begins in federal death penalty case


Jury selection begins this morning in Sioux City in the federal death
penalty trial of Angela Johnson. The 43-year-old Klemme native is the
former girlfriend of Dustin Honken, who was convicted last fall in the
drug slayings of 5 people, including two children, in the Mason City area
in 1993. The jury recommended the death penalty. Johnson is charged with
conspiring with Honken in the execution-style slayings. Attorneys predict
Johnson's trial will last about as long as Honken's 8-week trial and
feature much of the same evidence...but Johnson's trial will also feature
some unique twists, including testimony about her mental state in the days
after the bodies were discovered. Johnson tried to commit suicide in jail
after the bodies were found by investigators who used a map she drew and
gave to a jailhouse informant.

(source: RadioIowa News)






LOUISIANA:

Court OKs conviction, death penalty in killings of Clinton couple


A death sentence was upheld Tuesday for Gregory "Boo" Brown, convicted in
the 1998 execution-style killings of a Clinton couple.

The state Supreme Court, in a unanimous decision, rejected a list of
issues raised by Brown in the deaths of William and Ann Gay. The victims,
both in their 60s, were kidnapped from their patio as Brown and 4 other
men engaged in what the court called a campaign of terror. The couple was
shot to death and burned beyond recognition when their car was set afire
in Baton Rouge.

Investigators said the violence started when Brown and two others appeared
at the home of Ikie Roberts, a neighbor of the Gays, and Brown beat
Roberts with the claw end of a hammer while the other 2 men fled in
Roberts' truck.

Roberts was able to easily identify Brown, who lost 1 eye in a 1996
shootout. After the attack, Roberts went to another Clinton home, tried to
steal a pickup, and left a blood-soaked fingerprint on the door handle.
DNA tests showed the blood belonged to Brown and Ikie Roberts.

Investigators said Brown then went to the Gays' home and kidnapped them
because he needed a ride to Baton Rouge.

In the trial, Brown's defense lawyer said Brown lost the ability to
control his behavior when he was shot in the face in 1996 while committing
an armed robbery. Fragments of the bullet remain in Brown's brain,
preventing him from making correct decisions.

That issue became part of the appeal, questioning whether Brown is so
mentally impaired that he cannot be executed. The Supreme Court rejected
the argument, noting that Brown exhibited "intact survival mentality" by
destroying all traces of evidence in his crime by burning the victims in
their car, cleaning out his house and eluding police for 82 days after the
crime.

The court also rejected Brown's challenge of Roberts' identification,
along with a long list of other challenges.

Brown's case was handled by the Capital Appeals Project in New Orleans,
and a spokeswoman said an appeal to federal court was a certainty.

(source: Associated Press)






NEW YORK:

Albany Panel Closes Door on Death Penalty Measure


Democrats in the State Assembly closed the door today on reviving the
death penalty in New York State this year, handing a significant victory
to groups that are trying to build national momentum against capital
punishment.

With a vote by a key Assembly committee, the state's death penalty law now
appears likely to stay off the books for some years to come. The state's
top court struck down the law in June, finding a central element of its
sentencing provisions unconstitutional, and the opposition in the Assembly
is unlikely to change anytime soon because there is so little turnover
among incumbents in Albany.

New York also joins a handful of states where politicians have stepped
away from death penalty laws that their predecessors enacted in 38 states
after the United States Supreme Court restored capital punishment in 1976.
The State Legislature passed its law in 1995, although New York has never
executed a person under it.

Opponents of the death penalty from around the country packed a Capitol
hearing room here today to mark the Assembly's action, and hailed it
afterward as an important moment in the continuing legal and political
battles over the future of the laws. In particular, they noted that some
supporters of the 1995 law had now changed their minds on the death
penalty's infallibility, a shift they hope to stoke elsewhere.

"There is going to be a ripple effect coming out of Albany against capital
punishment, no question," said Shari Silberstein, co-director of the
Quizote Center, a national religious group that is pressing for
moratoriums on executions, who attended the hearings. "When a major state
like New York moves away from the death penalty, other states take notice
and ask questions of their own."

The Democratic resistance to the death penalty could also inject an
uncertain political element into the 2006 races for governor and
Legislature in New York. Gov. George E. Pataki showed the emotional appeal
of the issue in 1994 when he unseated Mario M. Cuomo in part by promising
voters that he, unlike Mr. Cuomo, would sign a death penalty law.

The Assembly's action today came at a half-hour meeting of the chamber's
Codes Committee, which voted 11 to 7 against a bill that would have made
changes to the death penalty law to address the state Court of Appeals
decision in June. All 11 nays came from Democrats; the committee's 4
Republicans and 3 Democrats voted to send the bill to the floor of the
Assembly, where the prospect for passage was expected to be close.

"The death penalty is, in effect, killed for this year," said Assemblyman
Joseph Lentol, a Democrat who is chairman of the committee, and one of the
members who backed the law in 1995 but voted against it today because of
new, personal doubts.

(source: New York Times)


FLORIDA:

Senate Panel OKs $5 Million Cap for Wrongfully Committed


Innocent people who were wrongfully imprisoned could seek up to $5 million
in compensation for lost wages, attorney fees and other losses under a
bill approved Tuesday by a Senate panel.

The measure was motivated by the case of Wilton Dedge, a Brevard County
man who was released from prison last summer after serving 22 years for a
rape he didn't commit.

Dedge wants lawmakers to give him $5 million for the nearly 8,000 days he
spent in prison to compensate for his lost wages, the money his family
spent to defend and visit him and the work done by the lawyers who fought
for his exoneration.

However, a competing House proposal would let Dedge and other wrongfully
imprisoned people seek either $200,000 or a package of health and
education benefits. That measure (HCR 1879) would let people to seek more
money from the Legislature if they had won a lawsuit. Dedge hasn't yet
sued.

The Senate measure (SB 1964) is modeled after the way government
compensates people who have property seized for roads or other public
projects, according to Sen. Dan Webster, a Winter Garden Republican who
was given the job of figuring out a possible solution by Senate President
Tom Lee, R-Brandon.

The Senate Judiciary Committee, which Webster chairs, voted unanimously
for the bill.

Noting that it differed significantly from the House position, Webster
said he tried to avoid "emotionalism" and find a middle ground. He said
the Senate bill was good public policy that upheld fundamental principles
like honoring the values of life, liberty and property.

The Senate bill sets up a way to compensate people who are imprisoned but
later found by "clear and convincing evidence" to be innocent of the crime
or of being an accomplice to the crime.

Wrongfully incarcerated people could seek compensation for lost wages,
attorney fees, court fines, loss of assets, lost earning capacity, work
done for the state during imprisonment, the cost of counseling and a
"reasonable amount of any other losses."

But the state would not be liable for punitive damages or damages for
"pain and suffering, humiliation, loss of consortium, emotional distress
or similar damages" under the bill.

People who commit other felonies or who plead guilty would not be eligible
for compensation.

After being found innocent by a court, a person would begin negotiations
with the office of the state attorney general. If those negotiations
failed to result in an acceptable settlement, the person could go to
court.

Any compensation would be offset by the amount of money the state paid to
provide health care or education to the person in prison.

The first $500,000 would be paid in a lump sum and any compensation over
that amount would be paid through annuity payments over a decade.

---

On the Net: Florida Legislature: http://www.leg.state.fl.us/

(source: Associated Press)



Reply via email to