Sept. 25


TEXAS:

Death row inmate's lawyers request new trial, citing romance between judge
and prosecutor


As expected, attorneys for death row inmate Charles Dean Hood filed a
petition today seeking a new trial for the condemned killer, claiming his
original trial was unfair because of the recently revealed romantic
relationship between Judge Verla Sue Holland, who presided, and then
District Attorney Tom O'Connell, who prosecuted the case.

The petition also castigated the current district attorney, his "minions,"
and the state attorney general for their actions in the case, which has
been bouncing through criminal and civil courts since Mr. Hoods execution
was called off at the eleventh hour in June.

"The wall of silence that has long surrounded Judge Holland and Mr.
OConnell has finally come crashing down," the filing said, referring to
recent depositions in which Judge Holland and Mr. O'Connell confirmed
their romantic involvement. "A fair and impartial tribunal is a bedrock
requirement of due process."

Mr. Hood, who was convicted for the 1989 killing in Plano of Tracie Lynn
Wallace and Ronald Williamson, deserves a new trial because "Judge Holland
created an appearance of impropriety and an impression of possible bias,"
the defense wrote.

Mr. Hoods attorneys were not available for comment.

According to the filing, Judge Holland, whose attorney also could not be
reached for comment, said in depositions that it was "absolutely not"
improper for her to preside over the case. She reportedly told attorneys
the romantic relationship began in 1982 and ended in 1987, several years
before Mr. Hood's 1990 trial. Mr. O'Connell recollected that it started in
1984 or 1985 and did not end until 1991 or 1992.

The depositions reportedly said both parties professed their love for each
other at the time.

According to the petition, Mr. O'Connell said Judge Holland had talked
about getting married, but Judge Holland denied that. Both parties said
they kept the relationship secret.

"Their sexual encounters took place at each other's homes when their
spouses were away," the filing says.

The 2 apparently remained good friends even as the romance dwindled. As
late as 1991, the pair went on a trip to Santa Fe together, and Mr.
O'Connell attended Judge Holland's family reunion in Missouri that same
year.

John Rolater, assistant district attorney for Collin County, declined to
comment on the petition, citing pending litigation.

The filing takes his office, which fought to keep the depositions from
being taken, to task, saying, "Their actions have been marked by
overzealousness that calls into question their adherence to their duty
'that justice shall be done.'"

Mr. Rolater again declined to respond, saying, "Matters like this should
be resolved in the court, not in sound bites."

The petition also questioned the conduct of state Attorney General Greg
Abbot, despite the fact that his office filed a "friend of the court"
brief calling for an investigation into the relationship a few days before
Mr. Hood's last execution date. The state's top lawyer criticized the
defense at the time for raising the claim after 18 years of litigation.

"The attorney general's cake-and-eat-it desires  to restore the publics
faith in judiciary while castigating Mr. Hood's attorneys for not coming
forward earlier with credible, compelling evidence of this furtive
relationship  raise serious questions about his commitments to justice in
this case."

The attorney general's office did not return a call for comment.

(source: Dallas Morning News)

************************

New trial sought for killer in affair case


Lawyers for a death row inmate whose execution was blocked after
allegations that his trial judge and prosecutor were having an affair
asked Texas' highest criminal court Thursday to grant him a new trial.

"The truth was deliberately concealed in this case for nearly 20 years,"
attorneys A. Richard Ellis and Greg Wiercioch said in their request to the
Texas Court of Criminal Appeals on behalf of Charles Dean Hood.

Hood won a reprieve from the court Sept. 9, a day before his scheduled
lethal injection, but not because of the secret romantic relationship
between his now-retired trial judge, Verla Sue Holland, and Tom O'Connell,
the former district attorney in Collin County in suburban Dallas.

Instead, the Austin-based appeals court where Holland served as a judge in
the late 1990s said it wanted to reconsider whether the jury instructions
at Hood's 1990 trial were flawed. A ruling favorable to Hood could result
in a new sentencing proceeding but not necessarily a complete new trial.

As Hood's execution neared, his lawyers alleged his trial was tainted by
the unethical and improper relationship and won a court order forcing
Holland and O'Connell to be questioned under oath. In depositions, the
pair acknowledged they'd had a years-long affair.

"This revelation casts a deep shadow over justice in this case," Hood's
attorneys said in their application for a new trial. "The wall of silence
that has long surrounded Judge Holland and Mr. O'Connell has finally come
crashing down."

The affair, they said, meant Hood's state and federal constitutional
rights to an impartial trial were violated.

Attorneys for Holland and O'Connell have declined to discuss the'
depositions, citing a gag order. Neither the judge nor the former
prosecutor has been publicly disciplined by the State Commission on
Judicial Conduct or the State Bar of Texas.

Laura Burstein, a spokeswoman for Hood's lawyers, said Thursday the
attorneys would "let the petition speak for itself."

Hood, 39, is a former bouncer at a topless club who was 20 when he was
arrested in Indiana for the fatal shootings of Tracie Lynn Wallace, 26, an
ex-dancer, and her boyfriend, Ronald Williamson, 46, at Williamson's home
in Plano in 1989.

Hood has maintained his innocence. He was driving Williamson's $70,000
Cadillac at the time of his arrest. Evidence against him included his
fingerprints at the murder scene. Hood has said he had permission to drive
the car and his fingerprints were at the house because he had been living
there.

The affair, an apparent open secret 20 years ago in Collin County legal
circles, gained traction in June when a former assistant district attorney
filed an affidavit saying it was "common knowledge" from at least 1987
until about 1993. The time includes Hood's trial.

In their depositions, according to the filing Thursday, Holland said the
romance began in 1982 and ended in 1987. O'Connell's account said the
romance began in 1984 or 1985, continued until mid 1989 and may have
continued beyond then.

The filing said the 2 discussed the possibility of marriage, remained good
friends and continued seeing each other as recently as 1992.

"That a judge charged with avoiding the appearance of bias and a
prosecutor tasked with doing justice would allow their desire for secrecy
to trump their sworn constitutional duties is a stunning display of
arrogance and the corrupting influence of power," Hood's lawyers said in
their request for a new trial.

"There is no dispute that Judge Holland and Mr. O'Connell were engaged in
a long-term, intimate sexual relationship prior to Mr. Hood's trial and
did not disclose that fact to Mr. Hood or his counsel. ... The damage to
Mr. Hood's constitutional right to a fair and impartial tribunal is
obvious and egregious."

The attorneys said as an alternative to a new trial, the appeals court
should send the case back to the trial court for additional proceedings
and "grant any other relief that law and justice require."

O'Connell was the county's elected district attorney from 1971-82 and from
1987-2002. Holland was a state district judge from 1974-96 before moving
on to the Court of Criminal Appeals from 1997-2002.

(source: Associated Press)






VIRGINIA:

Federal judge rejects condemned D.C. sniper's appeal


A federal judge has rejected an appeal from convicted sniper John Allen
Muhammad, who was sentenced to death for masterminding a 2002 killing
spree in the Washington, D.C., area that left 10 people dead.

Muhammad, now on death row in Virginia, alleged numerous errors at his
2003 trial. But U.S. District Judge Liam O'Grady in Alexandria, Va., on
Wednesday rejected all of Muhammad's claims challenging his conviction and
sentence.

Muhammad's appellate lawyers argued that Muhammad should not have been
allowed to serve as his own lawyer for part of the trial because of mental
illness. They also argued that the judge should have allowed testimony
about Muhammad's difficult childhood.

Muhammad can still appeal to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in
Richmond.

(source: Associated Press)






OKLAHOMA----impending execution

Execution of Jessie James Cummings set for tonight


Cummings, 52, is scheduled to die by lethal injection tonight at the
Oklahoma State Penitentiary for the September 1991 stabbing death of his
11-year-old niece. The girl's skeletal remains were found a month later,
dumped from a bridge in rural Choctaw County.

The case remained unsolved until 1994 when one of Cummings' 2 wives spoke
to investigators. Cummings, who has been described as a cruel, cold,
controlling man, was married to two women at once and had children with
the both women at the same time.

Investigators say Cummings convinced the wives to kill his sister, Judy
Moody Mayo, while he was in Oklahoma City for the day. When Cummings
returned, he helped the women dispose of Mayo's body in a farm pond near
Atoka Lake, investigators said. After molesting his niece, he took her to
a rural Choctaw County area and stabbed her. Cummings was initially
convicted in both deaths, but his conviction in his sister's death was
thrown out by the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals in 1998.

For McCool, Cummings' death will be justice for his victims.

"As adults we sometimes put ourselves in places where we know harm could
come to us, but children do not know of this fear but only trust the
adults they are with," McCool said.

McCool and OSBI Agent Reanae Childers will be among the witnesses at
Cummings's execution.

"It's the last thing we can do for Melissa," Childers said.

Cummings has maintained his innocence through numerous appeals and
requests to higher courts to look at his case. During his clemency hearing
in August, he continued to protest his conviction and declare his
innocence.

"The truth will come out," Cummings said during his clemency hearing.

Cummings has no pending appeals, despite protests from international
anti-death penalty groups.

(source: The Oklahoman)






MARYLAND:

Capital punishment, fatally flawed----Our view: Maryland's death penalty
should be replaced by life without parole


In a democracy, there can be no greater miscarriage of justice than the
execution of an innocent person. Yet this week, the state of Georgia came
frighteningly close to that possibility in the case of Troy A. Davis, a
death row inmate awaiting execution for the 1989 killing of a Savannah
police officer. His conviction was based almost entirely on the statements
of 9 purported eyewitnesses, 7 of whom later recanted their testimony. Mr.
Davis was only hours from execution when the U.S. Supreme Court granted a
temporary stay.

By coincidence, the court's action came on the same day Maryland's death
penalty commission held its final public hearing. The panel listened as
experts testified that the state's death penalty is deeply flawed. Among
those testifying was lawyer Patrick Kent, chief of the forensics unit in
the state public defender's office, who said even the best crime-solving
science is fallible: "The only way we can say we are not executing the
innocent is simply not to execute."

There is widespread agreement among law enforcement officials,
prosecutors, defense attorneys and legal scholars that capital punishment
does not deter crime, that it is unfair, arbitrary and capricious in its
application and that it protects the public no better than a life without
parole sentence.Some of the most compelling testimony to the Maryland
commission came from James P. Abbott, a New Jersey police chief who was
once a strong supporter of capital punishment but changed his mind after
studying the issue as a member of a similar panel in New Jersey. He now
"unequivocally" opposes the death penalty, even in cases involving the
killing of police officers. Asked what he would say to the family of a
slain officer, he admitted to a loss for words: "I don't know what you
tell the family," he said.

It was an honest response to a painful dilemma. Yet Mr. Abbott's answer
would have been equally true had the question been asked the other way
around: What does one say to the family of an innocent person wrongly
executed by the state? Perhaps to some questions there simply are no good
answers. But that doesn't make retaining the death penalty an acceptable
alternative.

(source: Editorial, Baltimore Sun)






UTAH:

Death penalty decision pushed back in Ragsdale case


Prosecutors agreed Wednesday to wait another 2 months before announcing
whether they intend to seek the death penalty in David Ragsdale's capital
murder case.

Ragsdale recently dismissed his private attorney in favor of
representation by court-appointed public defenders, who asked for the
extension.

The new defense team needs a good idea of the nature and quality of the
prosecution's case before deciding whether to take the case to trial,
explained prosecutor Dave Sturgill.

"The hope is that the time will help them and David Ragsdale make better
decisions about this case," Sturgill said.

Ragsdale is accused of shooting his estranged wife to death at point-blank
range in the parking lot of her Lehi church building this January.

Prosecutors hope to resolve the case without a trial, Sturgill said.

Documents filed in court by Ragsdale's sister maintain his innocence,
stating that Ragsdale was mentally incapacitated by prescription drugs and
unaware of his actions at the time of the shooting.

Wednesday marked the second extension of the deadline for deciding whether
to pursue the death penalty, which is normally determined within 60 days
of arraignment. This will be the last extension, Sturgill said.

The new deadline is Dec. 1, with a pre-trial conference set for Nov. 26.

(source: Salt Lake Tribune)




Reply via email to