April 30


CALIFORNIA----female could face death penalty

Stabbing suspect could face death penalty


Stephanie N. Erends could face the death penalty for allegedly stabbing
Alicia Ernst to death last month.

Prosecutor Garen Horst filed a second amended felony complaint with Placer
County Superior Court Tuesday alleging a special circumstance of lying in
wait in the murder of 24-year-old Ernst.

It has not been determined at this point if district attorneys office
plans to seek the death penalty.

"We will make our intentions known regarding the special circumstance
allegations at the next (court) appearance," Horst said to the court
Tuesday.

Erends, 25, has pleaded not guilty to a single felony charge of murder for
the March 8 death of Ernst.

Erends was in an Auburn courtroom with her court-appointed attorney John
Spurling Tuesday.

Spurling said outside the courtroom that the capital-case decision is up
to the prosecution.

"They think there's enough to support it," he said. "They have to prove
1st degree (murder) first."

In cases involving the death penalty, or life in prison without the
possibility of parole, the defendant's guilt of 1st-degree murder must
first be determined by a jury, according to Deering's Penal Code.

"If found guilty of 1st-degree murder, (the jury) shall at the time
determine the truth of all special circumstances charged," the code
states.

Erends, who has a prior felony conviction for possession of a controlled
substance, is also charged with a special allegation of the use of a
deadly weapon.

According to a felony complaint filed March 17 in Placer County Superior
Court, Erends reportedly used a sharp-edged utility tool to commit the
crime.

Ernst, a nurse's aide who was employed by Siena Care in Auburn, was found
dead in rural Roseville March 10 by an employee with the Department of
Public Works on the side of Walerga Road near Old Walerga Road.

Ernst and Erends reportedly knew one another, however, the motive for the
alleged killing has not been made public by officials.

Investigators reported that Ernst was killed in the early morning hours of
March 8 at the location where her body was found. The alleged murder
weapon has been recovered, officials said.

Ernst's mother clutched a large framed photograph of her daughter as she
sat in the front row of an Auburn courtroom Tuesday.

Ernst's family has yet to comment publicly about the alleged murder.

In a statement released to the media last month they said they were
devastated by their loss.

"Losing our beloved daughter, sister, niece, cousin and friend is an
incredible loss that words cannot describe," Brandon Ernst wrote in a
prepared statement. "Our family will be mourning this tragic loss for
years to come. Alicia will be dearly missed but never forgotten."

Erends remains in custody without bail in the Placer County Jail. She is
scheduled to return to Placer County Superior Court at 8:30 a.m. June 10
in Department 13 of Placer County Superior Court.

(source: Lincoln News Messenger)






DELAWARE:

Judge dismisses death penalty challenge


A Superior Court judge has dismissed a lawsuit filed by a death row inmate
challenging Delaware's lethal injection process.

Ax murderer Robert Jackson III argued that the state's execution policies
and procedures were illegally promulgated because the Department of
Correction did not allow for public review and comment.

Lawyers for the state argued that the DOC is exempted by statute from
having to publicly promulgate its policies, including procedures for
lethal injection, under the Administrative Procedures Act.

In a ruling handed down last week, Superior Court Judge Richard Cooch
agreed, granting the state's request to dismiss the lawsuit.

Cooch noted that, under state law, DOC policies and procedures are
considered confidential and not subject to disclosure except upon the
written authority of the DOC commissioner.

"Any change to the confidential procedure by which the Department of
Correction presently adopts its lethal injection policies and procedures
would require action by the General Assembly," the judge wrote.

Jackson, was sentenced to death after he was convicted of killing
Elizabeth Girardi in 1992, filed the lawsuit after the DOC instituted new
lethal injection procedures in August 2007. The change came after the 2005
execution of Brian Steckel, an unusually long procedure that prompted the
condemned man himself to ask "Why is it taking so long?"

Prison officials denied that there were any technical difficulties with
Steckel's execution, but revised the 3-drug protocol to increase the
amount of the first drug, the anesthetic sodium thiopental, from 2 grams
to 3 grams, and double the amount of the final, heart-stopping drug,
potassium chloride.

Jackson's lawyers argued that the DOC's exemption from the APA requirement
for public promulgation of state policies was intended to limit only
prisoner access, not public access, to DOC materials. They further argued
that imposition of the death penalty, from a policy standpoint, should not
be shielded from public view.

"Indeed, the ongoing and wide-ranging scope regarding the debate of
capital punishment nationwide, and in this state, reflects the public
scrutiny that such execution procedures should be brought to light," they
wrote. "Certainly parties interested in this debate should have the
opportunity to voice their concerns consistent with the requirements of
the APA."

Jackson's lawyers noted that administrative challenges to lethal injection
have been raised in several other states. They also cited a 2006 ruling in
which a court declared that Maryland's lethal injection protocol must be
promulgated in the same manner as other state regulations.

In their motion to dismiss Jackson's lawsuit, state lawyers argued that
administrative procedure challenges have become a common litigation tactic
"to effectively block the effectuation of lawfully imposed death
sentences."

While citing the "dearth of case law" construing the confidentiality of
DOC policies, Cooch noted that other states do not have an exemption
similar to Delaware's. The judge said there was no doubt that the General
Assembly intended DOC policies to be confidential, and that a 1998 court
ruling precluding inmate access to prison policies and procedures "all but
answers the issue raised in this motion."

Meanwhile, a federal judge in Wilmington is scheduled to meet with
attorneys next month to discuss a lawsuit - filed by Jackson and later
certified as a class action to include all Delaware death row inmates -
claiming that lethal injection is unconstitutional because it amounts to
cruel and unusual punishment.

District Judge Sue Robinson issued a stay in that lawsuit pending a U.S.
Supreme Court ruling in a similar lawsuit filed in Kentucky. The Supreme
Court earlier this month rejected the challenge to lethal injection in the
Kentucky case, clearing the way for resumption of executions across the
country.

(source: Associated Press)






TENNESSEE:

Federal appeals court upholds death penalty in fatal robbery


A federal appeals court has upheld the death sentence for a Nashville man
convicted of killing 3 people -- including a 12-year-old boy -- during a
market robbery.

Cecil Johnson Jr. was sentenced to death for the fatal robbery at Bob
Bell's Market on July 5, 1980. He was convicted in the death of the market
owner's son Bobbie and 2 men -- taxi driver James Moore and his passenger
Charles House-- outside of the store.

The 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled in a 2-1 decision that
evidence about eyewitness testimony not disclosed at the trial did not
violate Johnson's constitutional rights.

Bob Bell, the market owner, was wounded in the robbery and testified at
the trial to identify Johnson as the shooter.

The 51-year-old inmate was given 3 death sentences for the killings.

(source: WZTV News)

******************

Tennessee death row inmate seeks release


A man on Tennessee's death row for 22 years should be released because
modern DNA tests would have helped acquit him in the first place, his
lawyer told a federal appeals court panel Wednesday.

Paul G. House was convicted of murder in the July 1985 slaying of Carolyn
Muncey, whose body was found near her rural home about 25 miles northeast
of Knoxville.

The killing occurred four months after House was released from a prison in
Utah, where he had pleaded guilty and served time on a charge of
aggravated sexual assault.

Tennessee prosecutors alleged that House raped and murdered Muncey. House,
46, has always maintained he is innocent.

Evidence at his trial included semen on the victim's underwear and
nightgown. Updated tests years later showed the semen was from the woman's
husband.

"Without the (semen) evidence, the state can't come up with a case that
makes any sense whatsoever," defense attorney Stephen Kissinger told the
3-judge U.S. 6th Circuit Court of Appeals panel.

Jennifer Smith, representing the Tennessee attorney general's office, said
a positive DNA test wouldn't have made any difference because jurors were
told there was a chance the semen was from the woman's husband.

"The jury knew it could have been either-or," Smith said.

And it wouldn't have made any difference in the death-penalty
specification, she said.

"There never was evidence of rape; there was evidence of kidnapping,"
Smith said.

House was convicted and sentenced in February 1986, and the Tennessee
Supreme Court affirmed the verdict and sentence.

House's lawyer has argued that if the jury had known the DNA results, it
might not have convicted House or recommended the death penalty.

A federal district court in Tennessee rejected that argument, and a
3-judge federal appeals in Cincinnati affirmed that denial in March 2002.

A majority of judges on the court, known for its divide on capital
punishment, agreed to a full-court hearing that resulted in a 8-7 decision
2 years later, again rejecting House's petition.

"I am convinced we are faced with a real-life murder mystery, an authentic
'who-done-it' where the wrong man may be executed," Judge Ronald Lee
Gilman wrote in his dissent then.

"Despite his best efforts, the case against House remains strong," Judge
Alan E. Norris wrote for the majority.

The U.S. Supreme Court then agreed to consider an appeal by House that
legal experts said could help decide when people should get a fresh chance
to prove their innocence.

In June 2006, the court ordered a new hearing, calling the DNA evidence a
"new disclosure of central importance" that didn't prove actual innocence
but might have created reasonable doubt of guilt.

The decision noted that the only forensic evidence linking House to the
crimes was the semen and certain blood evidence that had been partially
discredited.

In December, U.S. District Judge Harry S. Mattice Jr. ruled as the Supreme
Court suggested and ordered the state to release House unless prosecutors
began a new trial within 180 days of the effective date of his order.

The clock was stopped on that order when Tennessee appealed the ruling,
setting up Wednesday's arguments. The appeals panel of Judges Gilbert
Merritt, Alan Norris and Eugene Siler Jr. did not indicate when they would
rule, but it often takes several months for decisions to be delivered.

Last year, 32 Tennessee legislators signed a letter urging Gov. Phil
Bredesen to pardon House, who has multiple sclerosis and is being housed
in a medical ward of Lois M. DeBerry Special Needs Facility prison in
Nashville.

(source: Associated Press)






FLORIDA:

Admitted Killer Wants Death Penalty


An admitted killer facing the death penalty doesn't want his lawyers to
fight for his life.

David Russ, who admitted to killing Madeleine Leinen, 58, doesn't want the
help of his attorneys who are ready to fight for him.

It's not only rare, but many veteran attorneys said they never recall
anything quite like it.

"There is nothing to excuse this," Russ said.

Russ already pleaded guilty to a brutal murder.

Leinen was killed in her own home. Russ stole her car and her ATM card.

Eventually arrested in Texas, his attorneys are ready to ask for mercy.

Russ' attorneys said he was beaten his entire childhood, his family
history includes some mental illness, he's a drug user, and he is sorry
for what happened. But Russ told the judge he does not want any of these
things used in his defense.

"I don't want to put the victim's family through it. Don't want to put my
family through it. I have taken ownership of this from day one. I stand
vulnerable, just like the victim stood vulnerable. I don't wish any
mitigation put on in this case," Russ said.

"I want what my son wants. I don't want him to die. He's my baby boy, I
don't want him to die, but at the same time, I have to respect his
wishes," mother Beth Webster said.

The judge still isn't sure what she'll do.

She's ordered an extensive 8 week pre-sentence investigation to know as
much as she can about his past.

He may not want a lengthy defense, but the judge could call witnesses
herself whether he wants her to or not to make sure her final decision is
based on all the facts.

(source: WESH News)

*************************

Death penalty sought in Cape Coral, North Fort Myers murders


The state attorneys office has filed notices seeking to put to death two
murder suspects.

Assistant State Attorney Marie Doerr filed notices of intent to seek the
death penalty against Robert Dunn and David Richard Patton.

Dunn is accused of gunning down his estranged wife in front of children at
Bobbie Noonans Child Care in Cape Coral on Jan. 25. He is charged with
1st-degree murder, armed burglary and child abuse.

David Richard Patton is charged with killing 2 sisters in North Fort Myers
on Sept. 10, 2006. Along with 2 counts of 1st-degree murder, Patton faces
1 count each of 1st-degree burglary, grand theft, grand theft of a motor
vehicle and arson.

(source: The News-Press)




COLORADO:

Ouray School Presents Dead Man Walking


Philosophical and moral questions will grip the attention of students and
community members in Ouray this week, when Ouray High School hosts a
lecture and a series of public discussions surrounding the death penalty
in conjunction with their presentation of the play Dead Man Walking.

The lecture, delivered by death-penalty expert and University of Colorado
Department of Sociology Chair Michael Radelet, Ph.D., will be held today,
Tuesday, April 29 at 7 p.m. at the Ouray Community Center. The play will
follow on Thursday and Friday, May 1 and 2, at 7 p.m. on the Ouray School
stage.

The play is based on the non-fiction book written by a New Orleans
Catholic nun, Sister Helen Prejean, who developed a relationship as a
spiritual advisor with 2 death row inmates in the 1980s. Radelet assisted
Sister Prejean in writing her book, which was adapted for the screen in a
1995 film of the same name.

Sister Helen Fenlon, national coordinator of the Dead Man Walking Play
Project, will accompany Radelet in an audience discussion after his
presentation on April 29. Sister Fenlon will also lead talks on both
evenings of the performances.

The film Dead Man Walking was directed by Academy Award-winning actor and
director Tim Robbins and starred Susan Sarandon and Sean Penn. Robbins
went on to pen the stage version in 2002.

Robbins has offered the play exclusively to schools in hopes of raising
awareness of the death penalty among young people. Ouray will be the 1st
high school in Colorado to present the play, according to teacher and play
director Nancy Nixon.

A schools involvement in the project comes with a requirement: death
penalty issues must be implemented in the curriculum of at least 2
academic departments other than the theater department.

Some students are eager to learn more about the death penalty at Tuesday's
lecture. Sophomores Arielle Baker and Peter Felde told The Ouray County
Watch that they have been discussing the pros and cons of the death
penalty in 10th-grade English class.

"I always sort of thought the death penalty was wrong, but the play shows
both sides of the story," Baker said.

Felde disagreed. "If a person is a cold hard killer, he probably deserves
a death sentence," he said.

Radelet will present the audience with a timeline and facts on the death
penalty. "4 out of every 10 murders are not solved," he explained in an
interview with The Watch on April 25. "Due to constraints on law
enforcement, it's more difficult to solve homicides." Radelet said that
his presentation will end "with an issue that brings us together  how to
assist the families of homicide victims."

According to statistics provided by Radelet, there were 102 executions and
175 lynchings in Colorado from 1859-1967. Since then, there has been 1
execution. He puts the 2007 death row population in the U.S. at 3,350 (59
are women; almost 55 % are minorities).

Since 1980, the death penalty has been sought 120 times in Colorado.
"Every time the death penalty is sought it costs oodles and oodles of
money" in court costs, Radelet explained. The professor sits on the board
of Denver-based Families of Homicide Victims and Missing Persons, a
nonprofit group that hopes to abolish the death penalty in Colorado in
order to reallocate funds into solving cold-case murders and
disappearances.

Junior Jake Abell sees the play as a venue to explore how a death sentence
impacts the families of victims and prisoners. "This is not an anti-death
penalty playit's a very intimate story about a family," he said.

(source: Telluride Watch)






OHIO:

Execution process resumes after pause


The state took its 1st step toward resuming lethal injections today,
requesting a new execution date for a convicted murderer who spread his
victim's dismembered body over parts of Ohio and Pennsylvania.

Kenneth Biros was 1 of 3 death row inmates in Ohio who lost appeals last
week before the U.S. Supreme Court following the justices' determination
that the cocktail of drugs Kentucky was using to execute criminals does
not inflict cruel and unusual punishment. The suit had the effect of
halting lethal injections nationwide. Ohio uses a drug cocktail similar to
Kentucky's.

The 49-year-old Biros came within hours of death last March before the
nation's high court called it off, ruling that Biros should be allowed to
join other inmates who protested Ohio's lethal injection process in court.

(source: Associated Press)




Reply via email to