July 25


MONTANA:

State says ACLU has no standing in Dawson case


Civil liberties groups have no legal standing to try to stop the execution
of death row inmate David Dawson, and have provided no evidence to support
their claims that lethal injection could constitute cruel and unusual
punishment, the state contends in documents filed Monday with the Montana
Supreme Court.

The arguments, written by Assistant Attorney General Pamela Collins, are
included in the state's response to a lawsuit brought by the American
Civil Liberties Union and others trying to stop Dawson's scheduled Aug. 11
execution.

Helena attorney Ron Waterman, representing the groups who asked the
Supreme Court to intervene, said Monday that the state's response doesn't
address the qualifications or background of the people who prepare and
administer the fatal drugs.

"Not only do you have to give drugs in the right proportion and use the
right types of drugs, but they have to be administered correctly,"
Waterman said. "That's the source of the risk that exposes individuals to
cruel and unusual punishment."

State law says the identity of the executioner must remain anonymous. The
person, chosen by the warden, must be trained to administer a lethal
injection, but doesn't have to be a physician or a nurse.

Dawson, convicted of murdering three members of a family in a Billings
motel in 1986, successfully won the right to dismiss his attorneys, end
his appeals and move forward with the execution. The civil liberties
groups, however, filed a lawsuit earlier this month asking the state
Supreme Court to suspend the execution, and any others in Montana, until a
court can decide whether lethal injection is humane.

In the state's 25-page response, Collins said the Supreme Court should
reject the groups' request outright, because "Dawson has specifically
informed this court that he does not desire to participate in this
lawsuit, and that he desires that his execution proceed as scheduled,"
Collins wrote.

In his own response to the lawsuit last week, Dawson said those trying to
suspend the execution "totally disregard" his "personal feelings and
wishes."

Waterman argued the groups do have standing in the suit because they are
trying to make sure the state is acting in accordance with the
constitution.

Even if the justices were to decide the groups have standing to sue,
Collins said their request still should be rejected for failing to provide
evidence to back up claims that Dawson's rights would be violated if
executed by lethal injection.

The state has "affirmatively established that the likelihood of a
condemned inmate in Montana suffering excruciating pain from the manner in
which Montana intends to carry out the sentence is so remote as to be
nonexistent," Collins wrote.

The plaintiffs, on the other hand, have provided only a "speculative
claim" that lethal injection would cause undue pain, Collins wrote.

The state's response included a declaration from Dr. Mark Dershwitz, an
anesthesiologist associated with the University of Massachusetts, who
argues that Montana's current lethal injection method does not involve
"torture or lingering death."

The U.S. Supreme Court recently made it easier for death row inmates to
contest lethal injections used for executions, allowing the legal claims
that chemicals used in such executions are too painful.

In his declaration, Dershwitz said he had examined Montana's protocols and
found that lethal injection administered by the state would "result in the
rapid and painless death of the condemned inmate."

Waterman said the ACLU, which only recently received access to the state's
lethal injection protocol, has other experts that see problems with the
protocol.

(source: Helena Independent Record)






MISSOURI:

State appeals court ruling on execution standard


Missouri officials filed an appeal Monday of a federal court order that
set an execution standard they have been unable to meet.

Attorney General Jay Nixon took the case to the 8th Circuit U.S. Court of
Appeals in St. Louis, saying U.S. District Judge Fernando Gaitan Jr. erred
in imposing a requirement that an anesthesiologist prepare the lethal drug
cocktail. The provision could effectively ban executions.

Ruling last month in the case of death row inmate Michael A. Taylor,
Gaitan halted Missouri executions over concern that the method could
subject the condemned to unconstitutionally cruel pain.

Chief among Gaitan's concerns was that for years a surgeon has had sole
discretion to mix lethal injections without written guidelines or
trainingin anesthesia. That surgeon, called John Doe I in court records,
said in a deposition last month that he was dyslexic and sometimes made
mistakes with facts and figures.

Putting so much discretion in the hands of a dyslexic doctor created an
unacceptable risk, Gaitan wrote. The judge also said he had grave concerns
about the doctor's qualifications.

Corrections officials met Gaitan's July 15 deadline to submit a plan for
overhauling procedures. But they said they could not meet a key
requirement to put an anesthesiologist in charge of preparing the lethal
drug cocktail.

None of 298 anesthesiologists responded to letters from the state asking
if they would consider the job, according to officials who then asked for
permission to continue using any physician, nurse or emergency medical
technician.

Taylor's lawyers filed papers Monday in Gaitan's court, urging him to
reject the state's proposal. They said it would leave the door open for
John Doe I to continue mixing of the lethal drugs, which they called
"completely unacceptable."

Taylor was sentenced to die for the murder of a 15-year-old girl in Kansas
City in 1989.

Death penalty critics say that if the condemned is not properly numbed by
the 1st drug administered, paralysis caused by the 2nd could make it
impossible to communicate pain that would accompany the 3rd.

(source: St. Louis Post-Dispatch)






CALIFORNIA:

Killer Who Sparked 3-Strikes Law Survives Overdose----Richard Davis, who
murdered Polly Klaas, 12, in 1993, is on San Quentin's death row.


Death row inmate Richard Allen Davis, whose 1993 kidnap and murder of
12-year-old Polly Klaas led to California's 3-strikes law, overdosed on
opiates in his San Quentin Prison cell but was revived, officials said
Monday.

San Quentin Prison spokesman Vernell Crittendon said Davis was found
unconscious in his cell at 5:13 p.m. Sunday. The infirmary suspected
opiates and administered medication to revive him before sending him to a
hospital, where opiates were found in his system, Crittendon said.

Davis was returned to his cell hours later.

The overdose is not the first at the prison's death row. On July 10, 2005,
inmate Nicholas Rodriguez died from a heroin overdose.

Another death row inmate, Larry Davis Jr., died on Sept. 2, 2005, of what
the coroner determined was "acute drug toxicity." But California
Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation spokeswoman Terry Thornton
said it was unclear in that case whether the drugs were prescription or
illicit.

"In all prisons, drugs make their way inside," she said. "That's a
reality."

Crittendon said Davis was being held in the high-security cellblock known
as the Adjustment Center and is allowed contact with about 60 other death
row inmates. He also has "contact with family, loved ones. There's any
number of ways that he could have possibly smuggled small quantities of
narcotics into the prison."

No additional drugs were found in Davis' cell, but Crittendon said prison
staff have begun "interviews and searches" to investigate the possible
source.

State investigations have shown that "staff bringing in drugs accounts for
less than 1%," Thornton said. "Most of it comes from visitors."

50 California death row prisoners have died since 1978 of causes other
than execution. Rodriguez's was the 1st death by overdose. 33 deaths were
from natural causes. 12 who died were confirmed suicides and several were
killed.

Crittendon said there was no evidence that Davis' overdose was a suicide
attempt.

Davis, 52, was already a repeat offender when he broke into the Klaas'
Petaluma home, kidnapped Polly, then sexually molested and killed her.
Outrage over the crime led to California's 3-strikes law, which requires a
sentence of 25 years to life for a 3rd felony if the first 2 are serious
or violent.

His double status as molester and instigator of the nation's strictest
sentencing law has made Davis unpopular in prison.

"He is not well-liked," Thornton said.

Davis routinely corresponds with the Canadian Coalition Against the Death
Penalty, which hosts websites on behalf of death row inmates. In addition
to artwork, photos of himself in the exercise yard and a lengthy missive
on his childhood titled "a tale of woe," Davis also sought a female pen
pal "who can show me how to be in love with life, before execution."

(source: Los Angeles Times)






DELAWARE:

Court will take 2 months to examine constitutionality of lethal injection


A convicted ax murderer's reprieve from the death chamber will last at
least another 2 months.

Following a brief telephone conference with attorneys, Today, Chief
District Judge Sue L. Robinson ordered state officials to respond to a
lawsuit filed by attorneys for inmate Robert W. Jackson III within the
next 60 days.

During that time, and likely until the case is resolved, Jackson's
execution will remain on hold, according to attorneys.

Jackson was originally scheduled to be put to death by lethal injection on
May 19 for the 1992 ax murder of 47-year-old Elizabeth Girardi during a
burglary of her Hockessin home.

Since Jackson's federal case raises questions about how Delaware carries
out the death penalty, no other executions will likely go forward until
the case is resolved.

Attorneys for Jackson contend that how Delaware carries out lethal
injection amounts to unconstitutionally cruel and unusual punishment.

(source: The News Journal)




Reply via email to