March 16




TEXAS----impending execution

Death Watch: A Question of Premeditation----Adam Kelly Ward set to die March 22


Shortly after 10am on June 13, 2005, 22-year-old Adam Kelly Ward was out front of his parents' home in Commerce, Texas, washing a car, when he started arguing with Michael Walker, a code compliance officer sent to take photographs of the home after the Wards had grown noncompliant on an unsheltered storage violation. Ward's father, Ralph, came outside to try to diffuse the situation, but in talking with Walker, realized his son had disappeared. Worried about the gun his bipolar and oft-agitated son kept in his bedroom, Ralph ran off to look for Ward, advising Walker to leave the property. Walker retreated to his truck and called for law enforcement's assistance. Moments later, however, before Ralph could find his son, Ward ran up to Walker's truck and shot the code compliance officer - 9 times in all.

In his confession, Ward told authorities that he believed the "city" was perpetually after his family, and that he feared for his own life after he and Walker started arguing. That worked against him, however, as prosecutors were able to point to the initial argument - plus a history of run-ins between the Ward and Walker families and the fact that Walker was unarmed - and charged Ward with shooting the officer in retaliation. Ward's trial attorneys attempted to argue that their client's mental state was too inept to conceive any prepared retaliation, but he was convicted of capital murder in June 2007 and sentenced to death. Habeas efforts filed at the state and federal levels have focused on Ward's lifelong troubles with mental illness, beginning with a bipolar diagnosis at age 4. Ward couldn't stay in school, couldn't keep a job, and in turn could not move out of his parents' deteriorating and often violent house. His habeas attorneys also pointed to a number of problems with the trial in general - like the fact that a friend and collaborator of the prosecution, Dr. Paul Zelhart, was seen having lunch and talking with jurors during the trial.

Ward's efforts for relief failed in federal court in March 2014. His appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals was denied in Jan. 2015. He got word that the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear his case 9 months later, and on Nov. 6, he received his execution date. He's currently set for execution at 6pm on Tuesday, March 22. He'll be the fifth Texan executed this year, and the 536th since the state reinstated the death penalty in 1976.

(source: Austin Chronicle)

***************

Ward execution date nearing


Last minute appeals continue to be filed, although an execution date is set in less than 2 weeks for a Commerce man, convicted of capital murder for the killing of one of the city's code enforcement officers almost 11 years ago.

Adam Kelly Ward is set to die on the evening of March 22.

Last fall, the U.S. Supreme Court refused to hear an appeal of Ward's 2007 conviction and sentence to death by lethal injection for the 2005 death of Michael "Pee Wee" Walker.

In January 2015 the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals also rejected Ward's formal appeal. Ward's attorneys had argued Ward's trial counsel was deficient. The court also denied a writ of habeas corpus filed in Ward's behalf in 2014.

In the writ, Ward contended his conviction and death penalty sentence were unconstitutional because he received ineffective assistance of trial counsel, was not tried by an impartial jury, and is severely mentally ill.

The court reviewed the case and in a 63-page opinion denied the writ in a unanimous ruling, also noting Ward failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right. Ward's defense counsel then filed the formal appeal with the court.

The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals, in a February 2010 ruling, also denied an appeal raised by Ward.

Walker was working as a code enforcement officer for the City of Commerce and shortly after 10 a.m. on June 13, 2005 he was taking photos of alleged code violations at the home where Ward lived on Caddo Street. The 3 engaged in a verbal altercation, which ended when Ward shot Walker as many as nine times with a .45 caliber semi-automatic pistol.

In order to have been convicted of capital murder, the prosecution had to show Ward knowingly and intentionally either obstructed Walker's ability to do his job or retaliated against Walker for doing his job as a public servant, while in the course of committing the murder.

Defense attorneys attempted to show Ward may have been psychotic and suffering from paranoid delusions at the time of the shooting.

Ward was found mentally competent to stand trial in a separate hearing which occurred even as a jury was being impaneled to consider guilt or innocence on the capital murder charge.

(source: Herald-Banner)

****************

My Regrets as a Juror Who Sent a Man to Death Row ----"If I could have done anything, it would have been to deadlock the jury, but I didn't have the personal strength to do that."


In 2008, Sven Berger got a letter instructing him to report for jury duty. He ended up on the jury of Paul Storey, a young black man on trial for the shooting death of Jonas Cherry, an employee at a putt-putt mini golf chain in Hurst, Texas (near Fort Worth). There was little doubt about guilt, but Storey was facing the death penalty, and Berger, along with 11 other jurors, had to decide whether he should die for the crime.

They unanimously decided he should, and Storey is still on death row. But 2 years after the trial, a lawyer handling Storey's appeals called the jurors and discovered that Berger was having second thoughts.

The lawyer showed Berger a new report from a psychologist, detailing Storey's "borderline intellectual functioning," history of depression, and other "mitigating evidence" Storey's lawyers had not presented during the trial. Berger wrote in an affidavit that had he heard this evidence, "I would not have voted for the death penalty."

Today, Berger works as a software engineer in Olympia, Wash. We spoke by phone and email over several weeks about his experience sentencing Storey to death, and his subsequent regrets. Here's his account of that experience.

D uring jury selection, when lawyers for both sides asked me questions, I saw Paul Storey in the courtroom. He was skinny, wearing a suit that clearly didn't fit him, and his tie was tied poorly - way too long. (I wore suits every day so I noticed that sort of thing.) He appeared to be friendly, though he didn't make much eye contact.

Maybe he was coached on how to behave.

I don't believe I met the other jurors until the trial began, and I was the youngest by maybe 10 years. The presentation of evidence was incredibly long, and actually boring for a while. Everyone was a little tense, which makes sense considering that nobody really wanted to be there.

Once we found Storey guilty - the case against him seemed airtight: he'd confessed to the shooting multiple times - lawyers made their cases for and against the death penalty over a period of 2 or 3 days. At one point, the defense presented evidence that Storey stayed out of trouble in jail during the time leading up to the trial, and participated in Bible study. I felt 2 ways about this: avoiding conflict is always good, but the whole finding religion thing made me suspicious of his intentions. I imagined a stereotypical prisoner, pretending to find God on the inside only to increase his chances of parole, or whatever. I'm sure this is unfounded, but we've all seen crime dramas or movies where some "reformed" criminal gets out just to inflict more harm.

To give someone a death sentence in Texas, the jury has to decide that he is capable of committing violent crime again in the future1. I didn't believe that from what I saw - I just didn't get the feeling he was dangerous. Maybe it was a gut feeling. But the other jurors seemed anxious to deliver the death penalty, except for 1 woman, who might have been sympathetic.

Texas is unique among death penalty states in requiring jurors to decide that a defendant will be a "continuing threat to society."

It was a very stressful situation, and my brain tends to block that sort of thing out, which makes recall difficult. But I know we didn't deliberate long - one to 2 hours, maybe. The room was pretty quiet; it felt like everyone came in already knowing how to vote.

All the other jurors thought he should be put to death.

If I could have done anything, it would have been to deadlock the jury, but I didn't have the personal strength to do it. I was 28, and not a mature 28. I've grown quite a lot since then, but at the time, I was really uncomfortable speaking out. Once we were asked to decide a sentence, I felt a rush of adrenaline and my stress level shot up. I couldn't have been the only one. In times like that, I know I don't think as clearly or rationally. I almost feel that in a case like this, jurors should be required to deliberate for some minimum amount of time.

When we delivered the sentence, it was quite emotional. That 1 woman juror - the one I thought had been sympathetic, like me - began to weep. I handed her my handkerchief.

The decision says something about who you are, and a lot of people don't want to look at the part of themselves that's willing to kill someone, to send them to death.

After we delivered the death sentence, we were told we could leave out the front and talk to press or go out a back door.

Everyone took the back door.

I felt guilty about what happened. And sad. And a little helpless. I talked with my parents and my wife about how it bothered me. Eventually I started saying, "I don't think I made the right call." I had a friend, a police officer, who was a sounding board, and he tried to make me feel better, saying Storey's sentence would be appealed and the case would last a long time.

Storey's mother made a Facebook page for him. I considered sending a friend request, but then I thought if anyone looked into it and found out, it would be weird. Maybe once a month, I'd look at the page, which had pictures of him in prison - I was curious to see how he was doing or if he got clemency. But Texas doesn't do that very often.

I've always wanted to contact Storey, yet it never felt right. What would I say? What would he say? I'm not sure I'd be open to speaking with someone who helped ensure my own execution.

(source: themarshallproject.org)






PENNSYLVANIA:

Death warrant signed in only local death penalty case


The death warrant has now been signed in Erie County's only active death penalty case. It's not expected to be carried out anytime soon.

Corrections Secretary John Wetzel signed the warrant for 46-year-old Stephen Treiber.

Treiber was convicted for the 2001 arson death of his 2-year-old daughter in Millcreek.

The warrant will be delayed because Governor Tom Wolf has issued a stay on executions in Pennsylvania. Trieber has asked for a federal appeal.

(source: yourerie.com)

*************

Frein's attorneys file motion to move trial from Pike County


Citing news reports that referred to accused cop killer Eric Matthew Frein as a monster, lunatic and coward, his attorneys filed a motion Tuesday to move his trial to a court outside of Pike County.

Attorney William Ruzzo and Michael Weinstein say extenswive pre-trial publicity, including dozens of news articles and campaign literature distributed by Pike County District Attorney Ray Tonkin, poisoned the jury pool, making it impossible for Frein to get a fair trial there.

The motion asks a judge to transfer the trial to another county or, in the alternative, bring in a jury from another county to hear the case.

Frein, 32, of Canadensis, is charged with fatally shooting Cpl. Bryon K. Dickson II of Dunmore and wounding Trooper Alex T. Douglass of Olyphant in an ambush outside the state police barracks in Blooming Grove on Sept. 12, 2014. He was captured on Oct. 30, 2014 following a 48-day manhunt. Tonkin is seeking the death penalty. Frein pleaded not guilty and is jailed in Pike County Correctional Facility awaiting trial.

Local and national news media organizations inundated Pike County and surrounding areas with inflammatory and sensationalized news reports before and after Frein's capture, the motion says. Those reports, which include coverage of various tributes and honors bestowed upon the victims, continue today.

"More than a year after the death of Dickson and the wounding of Douglass, there is not a segment of the population in Pike and Monroe counties which has not been touched by the defendant's case," the attorneys say.

The motion specifically cites 107 articles in area newspapers, including The Times-Tribune, and hours of television broadcasts aired by WNEP-TV, WBRE-TV and several other television stations.

Tonkin and/or his supporters made the situation worse, the attorneys say, distributing four campaign flyers during his successful 2015 bid for re-election that repeatedly referenced the word "murder" or "murderer" along with Frein's name or face, "clearly indicating (the) defendant is guilty of murder without being tried."

The motion notes one particularly poignant flyer that featured Dickson's mother, Darla Dickson, who is quoted as saying "Ray Tonkin is the only person I trust to bring justice for my son Bryon."

"The use of defendant's name and image as political fodder by the very district attorney who will prosecute him is a clear example of the sensational and inflammatory nature of the pretrial publicity in this case," the attorneys say.

The coverage clearly impacted residents, the attorneys say, as evidenced by letters to the editor and postings on social media sites. They cite one letter to the editor written by a state representative, who says the death penalty is "reserved for people like Eric Frein" who "are beyond redemption."

The filing comes 1 month after Ruzzo and Weinstein filed motion to suppress statements Frein made after his capture and a motion that challenges the constitutionality of the death penalty. Tonkin will have an opportunity to reply to each of the motions. A judge will issue a ruling at a later date.

(source: The Citizen's Voice)






NORTH CAROLINA:

Darryl Hunt's funeral to be held Saturday


Darryl Hunt, the man wrongfully convicted of rape and murder, and found dead this weekend will be laid to rest on Saturday.

The 51-year-old was found in a vehicle this weekend on University Parkway in Winston-Salem.

Police have not released any details surrounding his death.

Hunt spent nearly 20 years behind bars for the crimes. He was exonerated and released from prison in 2004.

Once released from prison, Hunt advocated against the death penalty, pushed for changes in the criminal justice system and helped people transition from prison life to civilian life.

A celebration of Hunt's life will be held at Emmanuel Baptist Church in Winston-Salem at 1 p.m. on Saturday.

(source: Fox News)






GEORGIA----impending execution

A clemency hearing has been set for a Georgia death row inmate set to be executed later this month


A clemency hearing is set for a Georgia death row inmate set to be executed later this month.

The State Board of Pardons and Paroles announced Tuesday that it will hear from advocates for Joshua Bishop on March 30. Bishop is scheduled to die the next day.

Bishop was convicted of murder and armed robbery in the 1994 beating death of Leverett Morrison in Milledgeville.

The parole board is the only entity in Georgia authorized to commute a death sentence.

Bishop, Morrison and Mark Braxley had been drinking and smoking crack on June 24, 1994. Prosecutors say Bishop tried to steal keys from Morrison, who was sleeping, and beat Morrison to death when he woke up.

Bishop and Braxley dumped Morrison's body between 2 trash bins and burned his Jeep.

(source: Associated Press)





******************

Execution date set in 1994 Millegeville murder case


A man convicted of a 1994 murder and armed robbery in Milledgeville is scheduled to die by lethal injection on March 31 at the Georgia Diagnostic and Classification Prison in Jackson, according to a news release from the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles.

Joshua Bishop, now 41, was sentenced to die in the electric chair 2 years after the June 1994 slaying of Leverett Lewis Morrison, a 43-year-old Milledgeville native who had traveled from Savannah to visit his children that summer.

Morrison had been out drinking that evening with Bishop and Mark Braxley, a 57-year-old currently serving a life sentence for his part in the killing, according to The Telegraph's archives. The 3 men returned to a mobile home off Linton Road.

Bishop and Braxley planned to steal Morrison's Jeep Wagoneer. The 2 bludgeoned Morrison's head and face with a blunt object, which was never found. After Morrison died, the 2 men wrapped his body in a sheet, placed it near a trash bin and burned his Jeep.

The U.S. Supreme Court denied Bishop's appeal request in October 2014, the release said. The Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles will meet March 30 with representatives willing to advocate clemency for Bishop.

(source: macon.com)






FLORIDA:

State fights to keep death-penalty option in 1987 murder case


State prosecutors have challenged a local judge's decision keeping prosecutors from seeking the death penalty against a man accused of raping and killing a Lake Worth mother of 3 nearly 30 years ago.

The recent ruling puts the case of Rodney Clark in the 1987 murder of Dana Fader in the league of a handful of Florida capital ones that were set for trial but are now ensnared in a January U.S. Supreme Court decision deeming Florida's death-penalty recommendation process unconstitutional.

Jury selection was supposed to have begun Thursday, but was postponed after local prosecutors contested Circuit Judge Charles Burton's ruling that would stop them from qualifying jurors to sentence Clark possibly to die if they convicted him of Fader's murder.

Prosecutors responded by filing an emergency petition to Florida's 4th District Court of Appeal on Friday, saying Burton's ruling was wrong. The court agreed to stall the case and rule on the issue based on a newly revised death penalty law.

"If Clark is permitted to go to trial while the State is precluded from seeking the death penalty, it will be irreparably harmed," Assistant Attorney General Celia Terenzio wrote in the request.

The appellate court this week gave defense attorneys 10 days to file a response, but with an unfolding legal morass surrounding the issue statewide, it could be months before Clark finds out whether prosecutors can still seek a death sentence against him.

Clark has been in jail since 2013, ever since authorities tied him to Fader's death through a DNA check on semen left at the crime scene.

Assistant State Attorney Reid Scott first asked Burton to postpone the case this year, after the U.S. Supreme Court by an 8-1 vote effectively struck down Florida's death penalty.

The problem with Florida's system, the Supreme Court ruled, was that a death penalty recommendation only required a simple majority and judges were allowed to make independent findings before imposing a sentence. All but 3 of the 31 U.S. states that have the death penalty require a unanimous vote for a death sentence.

The ruling sent Florida lawmakers scrambling to create a new law that would fix the system. As the bill wound its way through the state House and Senate, Burton denied prosecutors' quest to seek death against Clark, saying the Supreme Court's ruling meant there was no death penalty in Florida for the time being.

That changed last Monday, when Gov. Rick Scott signed a law that now requires at least 10 of 12 jurors to vote for death. Under the new law, judges also can no longer override a jury's recommendation.

By then, Assistant Public Defender Elizabeth Ramsey had responded by invoking Clark's constitutional right to a speedy trial, giving prosecutors just 60 days to bring his case to trial.

On the eve of jury selection Thursday, Scott filed a new motion announcing the state's intent to seek a death sentence against Clark based on the new law, but Burton ruled that the state ran afoul of a law requiring them to provide a legal basis for seeking a death sentence within 45 days of a defendant's indictment.

Clark's case is not the only one before a Florida appellate court. The 2nd District Court of Appeal is now considering the case of Steven Dykes, a 44-year-old Pinellas Park man against whom prosecutors are seeking a death sentence for the shaking death of his 3-month-old daughter.

And Florida's Supreme Court is still trying to figure out how to apply the U.S. Supreme Court ruling to Timothy Hurst, the man whose case was the basis for the Supreme Court decision.

The state's new process also requires a jury to vote unanimously that at least one aggravating factor supporting the death penalty exists, where previously jurors had to agree generally that aggravating factors both existed and outweighed mitigating factors.

(source: Palm Beach Post)






ALABAMA:

Towles gets death penalty a 2nd time for 2006 child killing


Kevin Andre Towles has been sentenced a 2nd time to die by lethal injection.

Etowah County Circuit Judge David Kimberley sentenced Towles this morning at the Etowah County Judicial Center.

A jury in December found Towles guilty of capital murder in the 2006 beating death of 5-year-old Geontae Glass. He had previously been convicted of the crime in 2009 and was sentenced to die, but his verdict was overturned by the Alabama Supreme Court.

The jury last year also unanimously recommended the death penalty for Towles.

Towles was accused of beating Geontae to death one weekend following a conduct report at a Rainbow City elementary school. Then Towles and the child's mother, Shalinda Glass, staged a kidnapping in order to dispose of the body.

Shalinda told authorities Geontae had been asleep in the back seat of her car when the car was stolen from an Albertville service station. The boy was found later in the car, dead in the trunk, at another home owned by Towles.

Authorities were able to discover the home when they found a utility bill bearing its address when they conducted a search of another home Towles owned.

Shalinda later pleaded guilty to murder and is serving time in prison.

During the trial, Geontae's sister Shaliyah, now 16, testified she saw Towles and the boy walk outside the home one Sunday morning, with Towles saying the child "had to pay for something."

Later, Towles came back into the house carrying Geontae, she said, who she never saw move or talk for the rest of the weekend until the incident at the service station on Dec. 4, 2006.

(source: al.com)


_______________________________________________
A service courtesy of Washburn University School of Law www.washburnlaw.edu

DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty
Unsubscribe: http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/options/deathpenalty

Reply via email to