Jan. 28




TEXAS:

Report: Texas bought seized execution drugs from India


Texas prison officials in 2015 arranged to buy lethal-injection drugs from a company in India that was busted for selling psychotropic drugs and opioids illegally to people in Europe and the United States, a new report claims.

When that deal fell through, they bought $25,000 worth of execution drugs from another supplier in India, a shipment seized in Houston by U.S. drug enforcers as an illegal importation, according to the report in BuzzFeed News.

BuzzFeed, in a detailed story posted late Thursday, said Texas Department of Criminal Justice officials notified the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration on Jan. 8, 2015 that they would be importing a large amount of sodium thiopental, Texas' execution drug, as required by a DEA license the agency holds.

"TDCJ will be importing Thiopental Sodium in 1 gram vials for a total of 500 to 1,000 grams per purchase/importation," a DEA investigative report published with the article shows. "TDCJ will be importing from the following supplier: Provizer Pharma."

Before the sale could be completed, however, Indian drug enforcement authorities raided Provizer Pharma's offices in the city of Surat, arrested five employees and seized an assortment of drugs, many of which are used as "party pills" in the United States,

India's Narcotics Control Bureau called the raid a "significant seizure."

Weeks later, Texas turned to another supplier in India -- identified in leaked DEA documents as Chris Harris -- and that shipment was seized in July 2015 at Houston's Bush Intercontinental Airport. A second shipment bound for Arizona was seized at the same time.

The seizures came after the U.S. Food and Drug Administration had warned Texas and its supplier, along with Arizona and Nebraska, that attempts to import the drugs would be illegal and that the shipments would be confiscated, officials earlier confirmed. A federal court at one point blocked its importation.

The BuzzFeed report provides new details about the source of Texas' execution drugs, long a secret that the state has battled in courts to keep out of public view, and of the lengths to which Texas and other states have gone to obtain them.

In recent years, as most companies in the United States and Europe have stopped making the drugs used in U.S. executions or prohibited their sale for lethal use, Texas and other states have had to resort to secondary suppliers where purchases have proven to be much more difficult.

Critics of the death penalty also have questioned whether the quality of those drugs can more easily be compromised, and whether they will kill condemned inmates without pain and suffering -- a key element in whether the use of those drugs could compromise the legal administration of the death penalty.

The Texas-bound executions drugs seized in July 2015 remain in DEA custody. Earlier this month, Texas sued the FDA seeking to release the drugs, accusing the agency of "gross incompetence or willful obstruction," according to court filings.

In its lawsuit, Texas referred to the source of the lethal drugs only as a "foreign distributor."

While the source of Texas' execution drugs used to be publicly available, state officials in recent years have made information about their suppliers a guarded secret as suppliers for the drugs dried up, some driven by pressure from death penalty opponents in the United States and Europe.

Attorney General Ken Paxton ordered the information secret, and state officials have fought since then to keep as many details as possible under wraps, including a threat against the DEA not to identify the supplier in the pending lawsuit over the confiscation.

Texas prison officials declined late Thursday to discuss any details in the BuzzFeed story, other than to say they had "not engaged in any transaction" with Provizer. They declined further comment.

"The story is highly speculative and inaccurate," said TDCJ spokesman Jason Clark, declining to discuss any details.

"TDCJ has a statutory responsibility to carry out court ordered executions in Texas," Clark said. "All drugs used in the lethal injection process are legally purchased and are tested by an independent lab for both potency and purity to ensure they meet national standards."

(source: Houston Chronicle)

************************

Texas Sought Banned Death Penalty Drugs From Overseas Party Dealers----In the future, President Trump's lifelong fanaticism for capital punishment could make such shady deals unnecessary.


Lethal injectionBrian Baer/ZUMA Press/NewscomThe state of Texas - hell bent on procuring banned drugs to be used in lethal injection executions - nearly completed a deal with 5 party drug dealers in India before the men were arrested.

According to an absolutely bonkers report in Buzzfeed, Indian court documents reveal Provizer Pharma - the company equally owned by 5 Indian men in their twentires - was selling "psychotropic drugs and opioids illegally to people in the US and Europe," but also had a deal in principle with Texas' Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ) to sell the agency sodium thiopental, a drug used in lethal injections.

The TDCJ wrote in a statement, "The agency has not engaged in any transaction with this company," which would technically be true, because the 5 men from Provinzer Pharma were arrested by India's Narcotics Control Bureau while picking up returned packages loaded with illegal drugs at a FedEx store in Surat before Provinzer's sale of sodium thiopental to the state of Texas could be completed.

But per a Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) report obtained by Buzzfeed, the TDCJ tipped off the DEA of the planned purchase, and even named Provinzer Pharma as the vendor.

Buzzfeed adds, "It's unclear how the Texas Department of Criminal Justice found this small company in India that made the rounds on Internet message boards for teens and 20-somethings looking to buy drugs without a prescription," but an American named Chris Harris ended up replacing Provinzer Pharma as Texas' drug supplier. Harris has made sales of death penalty drugs to 4 states - earning over $100,000 - but each time the drugs have been detained by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

As we've reported at Reason, death penalty states have had a hell of a time in recent years trying to get their hands on drugs used in executions, partially due to a European Union (EU) ban on the sale of such drugs to state governments that allow capital punishment, but also due to public backlash over the many executions which were botched because of drugs of questionable provenance and quality.

The final status of the FDA-impounded shipments of sodium thiopental from India is still unsettled. The U.S.'s lone manufacturer of the drug stopped producing it because of its use in executions, and for a time, the Obama administration's FDA allowed states to import the drug, but the agency was eventually ordered by a federal court that it had "a mandatory obligation" to keep the "the misbranded and unapproved drug, thiopental" out of the U.S.

That ruling came down in 2012, and has served as the FDA's go-to reasoning for refusing to release the detained shipments of drugs paid for by certain states' dollars.

Earlier this month, the Texas Department of Criminal Justice filed suit against the FDA, demanding the release of the drugs. Ars Technica reports Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton accused the FDA of "gross incompetence or willful obstruction" in refusing to make a final decision on the fate of the impounded drugs. Paxton's main argument is that the state has a "responsibility to carry out its law enforcement duties" - which includes executions - and thus should be granted a "law enforcement exemption" and be permitted to import sodium thiopental.

President Donald Trump might be the most enthusiastic proponent of capital punishment ever to inhabit the White House. It's one of the few policy positions on which he has never wavered, having taken a full-page ad in 4 major New York newspapers back in 1989 demanding "BRING BACK THE DEATH PENALTY", as well as writing in his 1997 book Trump: The Art of the Comeback, "I believe in an eye for an eye." In 2010, Trump said the punishment for WikiLeaks' publishing of classified documents provided by Chelsea Manning should be "the death penalty or something."

When Trump gets around to appointing a new FDA commissioner, he could direct the agency to stand down on its opposition to importing the drugs, which could theoretically help states like Texas make the case that the current court-imposed injunction should be done away with in deference to the FDA's wishes.

(source: Anthony Fisher, reason.com)

********************

With Executions Down, Will the Death Penalty Disappear?


Public radio stations from across the state collaborated on this series looking at the death penalty in Texas - its history, how it has changed, whom it affects and its future.

The death penalty has been slowly on the decline in the U.S. But would it surprise you to know that tough-on-crime Texas has also seen a decline in its use? What could that mean for the future of the penalty here?

If you watch a lot of cop shows and courtroom dramas, you might think capital punishment remains popular. But in reality, public support has waned.

"In the late 1990s, Pew measured support for the death penalty at 78 %," Robert Dunham, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center, said. "Its poll last year placed support for the death penalty down at 49 %. You're looking at a 29 % point decline."

He points beyond that Pew Research Center national poll to one out of Houston last year. Rice University's annual survey of attitudes in the city asked people what they thought the appropriate punishment for murder was. Only 27 % said the death penalty.

Dunham says he thinks the attitudes of people in Harris County provide a good snapshot of attitudes in large urban centers.

"Harris is even more significant because it has produced more death sentences than any other county in the United States, except for Los Angeles," he said.

After the 2016 presidential election, the next question has become: Are the polls right? In this case, Jordan Steiker, who directs the Capital Punishment Center at the University of Texas School of Law, said there???s pretty good real-life evidence that yes, the death penalty is losing popularity.

When there are 15,000 to 20,000 homicides a year, but only a couple dozen death sentences, he said, "no one can seriously argue that the death penalty is a significant part of the criminal justice system."

"It's not a significant part of how we respond to crime. It's not a significant part of how we respond to murder."

In 2016, there were only 4 new death sentences issued in Texas - none from Harris County. Compare that to 1999, when 48 people were sentenced to death.

What changed? A lot - everything from botched executions to inmate exonerations, which weakened public trust. Death penalty cases are also exponentially more expensive than regular murder trials. And starting in 2005, Texas juries were able to consider life without parole instead of death.

Steiker said he believes jurors are more sophisticated now. They take into account the criminal's life before the murder was committed. That includes a much better understanding of mental illness. Take for example, the 2012 mass shooting in an Aurora, Colo., movie theater.

"[There was a] huge loss of life, incomprehensible, terrible crime, but you also had a defendant who also had a very significant mental illness," he said. "And that prosecution did not produce a death sentence."

So the death penalty appears to be on its way out. But as long as Texans want to use the death penalty, it won't go away - so don't get too excited or upset about any bills filed to end capital punishment in the 2017 legislative session or any subsequent session.

Could the courts intervene to eliminate the death penalty? They haven't so far, even when presented with new arguments on whether the current drug cocktail used to carry out executions is constitutional.

"The Supreme Court hasn't been very welcoming of challenges to the drug protocol," Steiker said. "The Supreme Court has issued two significant decisions addressing challenges to the use of drugs and the risk of unnecessary pain given particular protocols and has rejected both of those challenges."

So if the death penalty dies in Texas, it may be in the way many old laws die: They remain on the books, but just aren't used.

(source: kera.org)






VIRGINIA:

Judge says prosecutors can seek death penalty for Welch


A Virginia judge has ruled that prosecutors may seek the death penalty against a man accused of killing 2 young Maryland sisters who disappeared more than 40 years ago.

News outlets report that Bedford County Circuit Judge James Updike Jr. denied a motion on Tuesday by Lloyd Lee Welch Jr.'s attorneys to rule out the death penalty ahead of Welch's 1st-degree murder trial in April.

The defense said Virginia didn't allow capital punishment when 12-year-old Sheila Lyon and 10-year-old Katherine Lyon disappeared in 1975, but the judge ruled that wasn't the case.

Updike also found that Welch breached his 2013 immunity agreement with Maryland prosecutors by changing his story several times.

The sisters were last seen walking to a mall in Washington's Maryland suburbs. Their bodies have never been found.

(source: Associated Press)






GEORGIA:

Rethinking Georgia's death penalty


A group of Georgia conservatives are calling for a "re-think" of the death penalty. At this point, however, they don't have plans to call to end it. In 2016, the amount of people put to death was the lowest it's been in 25 years in the U.S., but Georgia and Texas accounted for 80 % of the nation's deaths, with Georgia executing more prisoners than any other state.

Rep. Brett Harrell (R-Snellville), a member of the group called Georgia Conservatives Concerned About the Death Penalty, listed some of his reasons for being part of the group in a statement. He said, "Many individuals have been wrongly convicted and sentenced to die. Meanwhile, taxpayers are forced to pay for this risky government program, even though it costs far more than life without parole."

The death penalty does cost far more than life without parole. In a 2008 case in Georgia, the decision to seek the death penalty cost the state more than 3 million dollars.

On average, pursuing the death penalty in court costs taxpayers twice as much as life in prison including the prison time. A study in Oregon found that "61 death sentences handed down in Oregon cost taxpayers an average of $2.3 million, including incarceration costs, while a comparison group of 313 aggravated murder cases cost an average of $1.4 million."

Georgia's death row, like many across the nation, is also disproportionately African American - 50 % of death row convicts are black.

States without the death penalty have consistently had less murders. One suggestion is that government-sanctioned murder legitimizes violence, especially as the solution to a problem. Arguments have been made that the death penalty leads to desensitization and imitation, which also encourage violence in society.

In 2015, Georgia executed an African American man who had been on death row since 1995. As he was given lethal injection he mouthed the words "didn't do it." His lawyers argued there was never any physical evidence linking him to the murder. The way he was treated was heinous and inhumane.

Executing even one innocent person is unequivocally a crime against humanity. However, some studies show that as many as 1 person in 25 executed, are innocent. We can't claim to be civilized and treat people that way.

It isn't enough to simply "re-think" the death penalty. We need to end it.

(source: Opinion, Shelby Steuart; Better Georgia)






FLORIDA:

Murder trial of Kimberly Lucas put on hold until state's death penalty resolved


With prosecutors seeking the death penalty against Kimberly Lucas, the 4th District Court of Appeal on Friday stayed the 43-year-old Jupiter woman's upcoming trial on charges that she drowned her estranged partner's 2-year-old daughter and tried to kill her 10-year-old son in May 2014.

The trial, set to begin next week, will be delayed until the Florida Supreme Court decides 2 cases spurred by the controversy that was unleashed when the U.S. Supreme Court last year struck down the state's death penalty as unconstitutional, the West Palm Beach-based appeals court ordered. A bill has also been filed with the Florida Legislature to resolve the problems.

The nation's high court said the state law was flawed because it allowed judges, not juries, to sentence someone to death. Under a decades-old system, a jury's recommendation was purely advisory. The legislature last year passed a measure mandating that 10 of 12 jurors must recommend the death penalty before it could be imposed. The state supreme court struck down that measure, saying the juror's decision must be unanimous.

Attorneys representing Lucas said they plan to use an insanity defense in her trial on charges of murdering toddler Elliana Lucas-Jamason and attempting to murder Ethan Lucas-Jamason by drugging him.

(source: Palm Beach Post)

*****************************

Death penalty possible in upcoming trial of Brevard convicted felon----Judge rules death penalty law can be applied to case


The death penalty will be in play in the upcoming trial of a Brevard County convicted felon.

That was the ruling Friday from a county judge hearing prosecution and defense arguments in the double-murder case of 34-year-old Marcus Royal.

Royal is accused of murdering 81-year-old Faye Jones and 55-year-old Michael Fallon in 2013.

Prosecutors say Royal stabbed Jones to death inside her Cocoa home and then fatally attacked Fallon, who was her neighbor.

Royal is already serving life for violating his probation from a 1993 rape case.

Friday, his defense team requested from a judge a speedy trial for their client without the possibility of a death sentence.

While the judge agreed to start trial in February, he dismissed the notion that the death penalty should be off the table.

"The death penalty as a penalty is a constitutional penalty," said Judge Jim Earp.

The state Supreme Court says Florida's death penalty law, requiring a unanimous decision from a jury to send someone to death row, is constitutional.

Judge Earp accepted that in Friday's hearing.

"We're talking about something that's completely procedural," said the judge.

The defense wanted Royal to face life in prison without parole.

Prosecutors, on the other hand, said they're satisfied to now be building a case calling for death.

"Our role in this is to show them what happened and the circumstances and character issues that he has and then ask a jury is life enough in this case or is this so bad he should be executed," state attorney Bill Respess told News 6 following the hearing.

(source: clickorlando.com)






OHIO:

Judges should stop interfering with executions


Ohio's death penalty survived past challenges from people opposed to killing the worst of the worst in the state, eliminating rapists and murderers deemed impossible to rehabilitate.

Can it survive a blow by a Dayton magistrate judge who thinks he knows better than the U.S. Supreme Court?

Magistrate Judge Michael Merz in Dayton put a hold on the planned Feb. 15 execution of Ronald Phillips, who was sentenced to die for raping and killing his girlfriend's 3-month-old daughter, Sheila Marie Evans, in 1993.

Merz's reason focused on the sedative midazolam, the 1st step in a 3-drug cocktail Ohio plans to use to sedate, paralyze and then stop the hearts of condemned inmates.

Merz wrote the drug couldn't pass a constitutional bar of causing "substantial risk of serious harm" already set by the U.S. Supreme Court.

We're saddened to see Merz is trying to rewrite what the U.S. Supreme Court already said. In reality, last year the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the use of midazolam in an Oklahoma case.

We're also believe it's the correct move that the state immediately appealed the case to the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Cincinnati.

This feels like a case of legislating from the bench to us. Yes, some people object to executions. Still, they're the law of the land in Ohio and a tool to curb bad behaviors.

Executions have become complicated enough in the state, ever since the prolonged death of Dennis McGuire in 2014. It took 26 minutes, the longest execution since the death penalty returned to the state in 1999.

Since then, Ohio changed its 2-drug method, including now using a dose of midazolam that is 50 times more powerful to humanely end the life.

The state had trouble finding supplies of drugs, as drugmakers placed them off-limits for executions. Records show the state still has enough drugs on hand for dozens of executions, depending on when the drugs expire.

So when we see defendants' attorneys and the judge suggesting the state should use a different drug, the anesthetic pentobarbital, it seems they're trying to dictate how Ohio handles its prisoners deserving death. After all, pentobarbital, used frequently for animal euthanizations, can't be imported into the U.S. for human executions, thanks to a ban by the European Union.

The constitution demands they avoid cruel and unusual punishments. A powerful sedative answers that call, humanely letting condemned prisoners drift off to an eternal rest in a way their victims never got to enjoy. Then the proposed paralysis eliminates much of the pain for the witnesses watching as the heart-stopping medication takes effect.

There haven't been any executions since January 2014. There are 140 people on Ohio's death row, including Allen County's Jeronique Cunningham and Cleveland Jackson, awaiting the end of their lives. More importantly, there are victims of 140 people still awaiting justice, a justice being held off by a ruling by a judge who ignored the Supreme Court's own words.

We urge the court of appeals to have a swift ruling, to put these horrid cases behind us and give the victims' families the justice they're owed.

(source: Editorial, limaohio.com)

******************

State Rep. Antonio Calls For An End To Ohio's Death Penalty In Wake Of Recent Legal Barriers----Ohio's new 3-drug lethal injection method has been ruled unconstitutional.


Ohio's new 3-drug lethal injection has been under fire recently, resulting in the indefinite suspension of 3 planned executions of Ohio inmates, including 1 scheduled in February.

Today, House Democratic Whip Nickie Antonio, from Lakewood, responded to a ruling by U.S. District Court Magistrate Judge Michael Merz declaring Ohio's new 3-drug lethal injection process unconstitutional.

"When the proposed drugs for lethal injection are found to be unconstitutional because they may cause 'substantial risk of serious harm', it is immoral for the state to continue to fight to use them," Antonio said in a press release. "I believe it is long past time we abolish the death penalty in Ohio and replace it with a sentence of life without parole."

Antonio has repeatedly introduced legislation to end capital punishment and replace it with life without parole, citing research that shows the death penalty does not deter violent crime and is administered with disparities across economic and racial lines. In the 131st General Assembly, she sponsored Ohio House Bill 289 with Dayton-area Rep. Niraj Antani, a Republican from Miami Township, and plans to reintroduce the bill in the coming months.

Antani would not talk about his sponsorship of Ohio House Bill 287 or why he appears to be against the death penalty.

(source: patch.com)

*************************

A look at the status of the death penalty in several states


The stop-and-start nature of U.S. executions in recent years hit another speed bump this week when a federal judge found Ohio's latest lethal injection procedure unconstitutional.

The ruling by Magistrate Judge Michael Merz went far beyond nitpicking the state's procedures, and on one point raised potential problems for at least 3 other states that use the disputed sedative midazolam.

States have struggled for years now to find lethal drugs that pass constitutional muster after pharmaceutical companies and distributors banned their use in executions.

Some states turned to midazolam to replace anesthetics and barbiturates used more successfully in the past, but that led to problematic executions and numerous court challenges.

Alabama, Oklahoma and Virginia are among the states whose protocols have called for midazolam, though the prison departments in those states may not currently have the drug.

In the Ohio ruling, the judge agreed with attorneys for 3 condemned killers that midazolam, the 1st drug in Ohio's process, couldn't pass a constitutional bar of causing "substantial risk of serious harm" previously set by the U.S. Supreme Court in a 2008 ruling out of Kentucky.

The judge also barred Ohio from using the 2nd and 3rd drugs in the states' protocol, which paralyze inmates and then stop their hearts. Instead, the state should look to use a compounded version of pentobarbital, a barbiturate, the judge said.

Ohio has been unable to obtain pentobarbital, although other states such as Missouri and Texas have been able to without saying where it's from.

Ohio said it had enough drugs in its latest 3-drug method to carry out 4 executions.

Struggles by states to find drugs and put inmates to death amid legal challenges come as death sentences and executions continue to decline sharply.

Only 30 people were sentenced to death in the United States last year, the lowest number since the early 1970s. Just 20 people were executed in 2016, the fewest since 1991, and a far cry from 1999, when there were 98 executions.

Some of the country's historically most active death penalty states and their outlook for executions:

---

ALABAMA

-- Inmates on death row: 183.

-- Scheduled executions: None. State is currently seeking an execution date for Robert Melson, sentenced to die for the 1994 shooting death of 3 fast-food workers.

-- Execution method: Lethal injection unless inmate requests the electric chair. In past executions, the state used midazolam; rocuronium bromide, a paralytic; and potassium chloride, which stops the heart.

-- Supply and source: The state is presumed to have a supply of execution drugs since the attorney general's office is seeking an execution date. The Department of Corrections refuses to disclose the source of drugs or how they were obtained.

-- Last execution: Dec. 8, Ronald Bert Smith Jr., for killing a convenience store clerk in a 1994 robbery. Smith coughed and his upper body heaved repeatedly for 13 minutes as he was being sedated.

---

FLORIDA

-- Inmates on death row: 383.

-- Scheduled executions: None.

-- Execution method: Inmates can choose between lethal injection and the electric chair. The lethal injection drugs are etomidate, an anesthetic; rocuronium bromide; and potassium chloride.

-- Supply and source: The state refuses to name the source of its drugs or other details.

-- Last execution: Jan. 7, 2016, Oscar Ray Bolin Jr., sentenced to die for killing 3 Tampa Bay-area women.

---

GEORGIA

-- Inmates on death row: 57.

-- Scheduled executions: None, but several inmates are close to exhausting appeals. Georgia law requires that execution dates be set no more than 20 days in advance and no less than 10.

-- Execution method: Lethal injection using compounded pentobarbital, a barbiturate.

-- Supply and source: A compounding pharmacy the state won't identify under a 2013 secrecy law. Records show the drug has been manufactured about a week beforehand, delivered 1 to 2 days before an execution, and has a shelf life of about 30 days.

-- Last execution: Dec. 6, William Sallie, for killing his father-in-law in 1990.

---

LOUISIANA

-- Inmates on death row: 73.

-- Scheduled executions: None scheduled. A federal lawsuit challenging Louisiana's lethal injection method has delayed executions since 2014 with no resolution expected until at least 2018.

-- Execution method: Newest method calls for midazolam and hydromorphone, a painkiller.

-- Supply and source: State does not currently have a supply or source of lethal injection drugs.

-- Last execution: Jan. 7, 2010, Gerald Bordelon, sentenced to die for killing his 12-year-old stepdaughter in 2002.

---

MISSOURI

-- Inmates on death row: 25.

-- Scheduled executions: Jan. 31, Mark Christeson, sentenced to die for killing a woman and her 2 children in 1998.

-- Execution method: Single dose of pentobarbital.

-- Supply and source: Believed to be manufactured by a compounding pharmacy. The Associated Press and other news organizations are involved in a lawsuit over the secrecy of Missouri's process, including how it obtains the execution drug.

-- Last execution: May 11, Earl Forrest, for killing 2 people in a drug dispute and a sheriff's deputy in a subsequent shootout in 2002.

---

OHIO

-- Inmates on death row: 138.

-- Scheduled executions: 29.

-- Execution method: The current method calling for midazolam; rocuronium bromide; and potassium chloride, is on hold following a federal judge's ruling Thursday rejecting that process.

-- Supply and source: A 2015 secrecy law and court rulings allow the Ohio prisons department to shield the source of its drugs. Records show the state had enough of its 3 drugs on hand for multiple executions. The state says that doesn't take into account the drugs' expiration dates and other factors.

-- Last execution: Jan. 16, 2014, Dennis McGuire, for the 1989 killing of a woman. McGuire was put to death with a never-tried 2-drug combination including midazolam and hydromorphone, a painkiller, and snorted and gasped during the 26 minutes it took him to die.

---

OKLAHOMA

-- Inmates on death row: 48.

-- Scheduled executions: None. Executions are on hold until a new set of lethal injection protocols are approved. If that happens, 13 inmates have exhausted their appeals and could be executed.

-- Execution method: Lethal injection; if unavailable the other methods allowed are nitrogen gas, the electric chair and the firing squad.

-- Supply and source: Oklahoma does not currently have a Drug Enforcement Administration license, and according to a prison system spokesman is not legally able to store execution drugs at the Oklahoma State Penitentiary in McAlester, where death row is located. Oklahoma previously obtained drugs from an unidentified pharmacy.

-- Last execution: Jan. 15, 2015, Charles Warner, for the 1997 killing of his roommate's infant daughter. "My body is on fire," he said after receiving midazolam, the 1st in a 3-drug method, though he showed no other signs of distress. 9 months later, it was learned that prison officials used the wrong 3rd drug in the state's execution protocol - potassium acetate instead of potassium chloride - to execute Warner.

---

TENNESSEE

-- Inmates on death row: 63.

-- Scheduled executions: None.

-- Execution method: A single dose of compounded pentobarbital, or the electric chair. Executions are on hold pending a state Supreme Court decision on a challenge by inmates to the single dose, which replaced a 3-drug method.

-- Supply and source: The Tennessee Department of Correction doesn't have any lethal drugs currently but officials "are diligently working to secure them."

-- Last execution: Dec 2, 2009, Cecil Johnson, sentenced to die for killing 3 people during a 1980 convenience store robbery.

---

TEXAS

-- Inmates on death row: 242. -- Scheduled executions: John Ramirez, on Feb. 2, for killing a convenience store clerk in 2004; and Tilon Lashon Carter, Feb. 7, for killing an 89-year-old man in 2004.

-- Execution method: Lethal injection using pentobarbital.

-- Supply and source: An unidentified compounding pharmacy provides the drugs, but all information about the drug is shielded by state law.

-- Last execution: Thursday, Terry Edwards, sentenced to die for killing 2 people in a 2002 robbery in Dallas.

---

VIRGINIA

-- Inmates on death row: 6.

-- Scheduled executions: None.

-- Execution method: Inmates can choose between the electric chair and a 3-drug combination of midazolam or pentobarbital or thiopental sodium in the 1st step; rocuronium bromide or pancuronium bromide for the 2nd step; and potassium chloride.

-- Supply and source: Before the state's last execution, on Jan. 18, prison officials said they had enough lethal drugs for 2 executions. They obtained midazolam and potassium chloride from a compounding pharmacy whose identity is confidential under state law. They also have rocuronium bromide from Cardinal Health, an Ohio-based pharmaceutical wholesaler.

-- Last execution: Ricky Gray, Jan. 18, for the 2006 slayings of 9- and 4-year-old sisters and their parents at their Richmond home.

(source: Associated Press)

_______________________________________________
A service courtesy of Washburn University School of Law www.washburnlaw.edu

DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty
Unsubscribe: http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/options/deathpenalty

Reply via email to