July 30




ZIMBABWE:

Our hope is on Mnangagwa



I remember it was in 2013 in Bulawayo in Cowdray Part Surbub at Mukitika Primary School on a Sunday. The COPAC had announced that they will hold a public hearing on the proposed Zimbabwe Constitution. Although the meeting was supposed to be attended by Cowdray Park residence ZANU PF bussed people from nearby plots and farms with an obvious aim to disrupt the hearings. Thanks for the Honourable legislators who were chairing the meeting progressed without any incidence.

After the meeting had been officially opened deliberations started. We first discussed the Bill of Rights. There was a rare unity between ZANU PF and MDC supporters on the Bill of Rights. All people present unanimously agreed that every Zimbabwean must have a right to life. We agreed that no one must be allowed to take away someone's life for whatever reasons. Christians contended that nobody have a right to take anybody's life except God the life giver. MDC ZANU PF Christians we unanimously agreed on that.

We then moved to the issue of the death penalty or death sentence whether it must be maintained in the constitution or total be removed. There was a contestation of ideas here. It seemed the majority wanted the death sentence to be maintained. Suddenly people changed. It looks like they had completely forgotten what we had agreed under the Bill of Rights. Speaker after speaker stood up to support the idea of maintaining the death sentence in the constitution. I was given a chance to speak. I advocated for the removal of the death sentence reminding the gathering what we had just agreed under the Bill of Right. Unfortunately I was in the minority. When the issue was finally put to vote we lost. People wanted the death sentence to be retained in the New Constitution of Zimbabwe. It was sad.

The death sentence had always a controversial topic. Some people are in support of it some are against it.However, it must be noted that people are being killed throughout the world almost every day, a number are still on death row. Some people are being killed for trivial crimes like "who you sleep with, in others it is reserved for acts of terror and murder." (Amnesty International)

The author is of the view that Zimbabweans made a great mistake in retaining the death sentence in the new constitution which we voted for in 2013.The author advocate for the total removal of the death sentence from our constitution and laws.

According to Amnesty International the death penalty is unfair because before anyone is executed he or she is made to wait for years on the death row. Certain Japanese man was made to wait for 46 years not knowing when his time was to come. In Zimbabwe we have people who are still on the death raw for more than 10 years now. It's unfair.

The death penalty is also cruel, inhuman and degrading. According to Salil Shelty "The death penalty is a symptom of a culture of violence, not a solution to it." Execution methods includes beheading, electrocution, hanging, lethal injection, shooting in the back of the head or shooting by a firing squad. It's so chilling, ruthless, cruel and violent.

The other issue is humans can make errors and judges are not an exception. Let's say someone is erroneously charged and erroneously convicted and sentenced to death and then killed immediately. If at a later stage it is found out that the person was erroneously convicted, it is not possible to reverse the killing of an innocent person.

I had also pointed it out in one of my recent articles that long jail sentences do not deter crime. The idea that long jail terms deter crime hasn't been proven anywhere this includes the death sentence, it doesn't deter crime in any way. Life sentences are rather better than the death sentence in serious crimes.

The death penalty is also discriminatory. The Amnesty International says it is the poor belonging to a "wrong "race, ethnic group, religious minority group, or political party that end up facing the gallows. In Zimbabwe the discrimination is quite glare, it is men only who can be given the death sentence women are spared. We were not told the reasons for this discriminatory nature of sentencing. We all know that 52% of Zimbabwean population are women then why kill the few and spare the majority. Is there any motive to extinguish men in Zimbabwe?

The death penalty breaches two essential human rights: the right to life and right to live a life free from torture. Both rights are protected under the Universal Declaration of Human Rights adopted by the United Nations in 1948, according to Amnesty International. Zimbabwe is a member of United Nations, why are we then killing people violating their rights?

Since 1948 the momentum to ban the death sentence globally is growing. As of 2016 104 countries had totally banned the death penalty including the majority of countries in Southern Africa but Zimbabwe still maintains the death penalty in its laws.

Vice President Mnangagwa who is also the Minister of Justice has been quoted on numerous occasions in the media as saying he is opposed to the death penalty. Recently he crafted the first constitutional amendment which was adopted by parliament. We hope that he will do the honourable thing and craft the second constitutional amendment and remove totally the death sentence from our constitution. I also hope that legislators from ZANU and MDC will unanimously vote and approve the 2nd constitutional amendment to remove the death sentence from the Zimbabwean Constitution.

(source: Opinion; Etiwel Mutero is an archivist and political commentator----bulawayo24.com)








INDIA:

Gopal Gandhi opposes death penalty in all cases



This vehement opposition to death penalty springs from myth that it can lead to increase in murders. Facts show otherwise.

The process to elect the Vice-President of the country has started. There is a straight fight between the NDA candidate Venkaiah Naidu, and Opposition's Gopal Krishna Gandhi. But this piece is not about the election. It is about the place of death penalty in a civilised country like ours, in the context of the protests against Gopal Gandhi on the ground that he had asked for Yakub Menon's death penalty to be commuted to life imprisonment in the Mumbai blasts case, which had killed many innocent citizens. Headlines were flashed to say that Gopal Gandhi wanted mercy to be given to the terrorists. This was an incorrect interpretation of what he had said. It is not denied that Gopal Gandhi has been a long time opponent of death penalty. Around 2 years ago, the Law Commission of India had held a seminar on death penalty. I was one of the speakers there. I am for the abolition of death penalty. A near unanimous resolution was passed there for the abolition of death penalty. Consistent with his stand, Gopal Gandhi too voted for the abolition of death penalty. In fact for abolitionists like us, the judgement is not based on any individual case, but on the principle that death sentence to anyone is inconsistent with a civilised society and does not even serve as a deterrent and violates human rights.

Let us recall that some the greatest men have all opposed death penalty. Gandhiji said, "I do regard death sentence as contrary to ahimsa. Only He can take it who gives it." Freedom fighter and socialist leader Jayaprakash Narayan said, "To my mind, it is ultimately a question of respect for life and human approach to those who commit grievous hurts to others. Death sentence is no remedy for such crimes."

Dr B.R. Ambedkar, during the Constituent Assembly debates said, "I think that having regard to this fact, the proper thing for this country to do is to abolish the death sentence altogether."

The High Commissioner for Human Rights, Louise Arbour called the death penalty "...a sanction that should have no place in any society that claims to value human rights and the inviolability of the person". President Eduardo Frei of Chile said, "I cannot believe that to defend life and punish the person that kills, the State should in its turn kill. The death penalty is as inhuman as the crime which motivates it."

The vociferous opposition to the abolition of death penalty springs from myth that it can lead to increase of murders. Facts show otherwise. Thus, in 1945-50 the State of Travancore, which had no death penalty, had 962 murders, whereas during 1950-55, when death sentence was introduced, there were 967 murders. In Canada, after the abolition of death penalty in 1976, the homicide rate has declined. In 2000, there were 542 homicides in Canada - 16 less than in 1998 and 159 less than in 1975 (1 year prior to the abolition of capital punishment).

In 1997, the Attorney General of Massachusetts (US) said, "there is not a shred of credible evidence that the death penalty lowers the murder rate. In fact, without the death penalty the murder rate in Massachusetts is about 1/2 the national average."

Death penalty has been abolished since 1965 in UK. The membership of European Union is dependent on having no death penalty. This has been done obviously in the confidence that murders do not get automatically reduced by retaining death penalty.

The South African Constitutional Court unanimously ruled in 1995 that death penalty was unconstitutional as it constituted "cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment".

At present, 105 countries have abolished death penalty in law for all crimes - a majority of world states, as of April 2017.

I may also remind critics of Gopal Gandhi that when India wanted Abu Salem, who was then living in Portugal, to proceed against him for the same Mumbai 1993 blasts, Government of India gave an undertaking to Portugal that he would not be given the death penalty. That is why, although convicted, he has been given the life sentence.

The injustice of death as a penalty has a hoary past. Although death penalty was briefly banned in China between 747 and 759 AD, modern opposition to death penalty stems from the book of the Italian Cesare Beccaria Dei Delitti e Delle Pene (On Crimes and Punishments), published in 1764. Influenced by the book, Grand Duke Leopold II of Habsburg, the future Emperor of Austria, abolished death penalty in the then-independent Granducato di Toscana (Tuscany). It was the 1st permanent abolition in modern times. On 30 November 1786, after having de facto blocked capital executions (the last was in 1769), Leopold promulgated the reform of the penal code that abolished death penalty and ordered the destruction of all the instruments for capital execution in his land. In 2000, Tuscany's regional authorities instituted an annual holiday on 30 November to commemorate the event. The event is also commemorated on this day by 300 cities around the world celebrating the Cities for the Life Day.

In 1849, the Roman Republic became the 1st country to ban capital punishment in its Constitution. Venezuela abolished death penalty in 1863 and Portugal did so in 1867.

Will the critics of Gopal Gandhi on the death penalty issue please have the courtesy of apologising for their totally unsustainable comments?

(source: sundayguardianlive.com)








EGYPT:

Court sentences 8 to death over violent crimes against police



Cairo Criminal Court referred documents of 8 defendants on Saturday, in the case known as the "storming of Helwan police station," to Egypt's Grand Mufti Shawky Allam in preparation of their death sentence penalty.

The court said it sent its verdict to Egypt's Grand Mufti for his opinion, on whether or not their ruling was in accordance with Sharia law (Islamic law). The Mufti's opinion is almost always in favor of the judge's verdict.

The court adjourned the verdicts against the rest of the defendants, 60, until October 10 to read the ruling on all defendants in 1 session.

The case incidents date back to August 2013, when the defendants besieged Helwan police station and hurled Molotov cocktails, stones and shot at forces in the station, killing 3 policemen, and 2 bystanders.

19 others were injured in the seige, which burnt the station, 20 police vehicles, and 3 private cars.

The defendants face a number of charges including joining a militant group, intended to disrupt the constitution and laws, murder and attempted murder, and possession of unlicensed firearms.

(source: egyptindependent.com)

_______________________________________________
A service courtesy of Washburn University School of Law www.washburnlaw.edu

DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty
Unsubscribe: http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/options/deathpenalty

Reply via email to