April 2



FLORIDA:

Mariotti trial starts Monday for murder of Leesburg woman



It is just one of the death penalty "aggravator" categories that prosecutors are listing in their case against a man charged with strangling Bernadine Montgomery in her home in June 2016.

Whether David Mariotti, 35, is found guilty of 1st-degree murder in the trial that begins Monday is up to the jury. But there is no doubt that the crime itself - including the use of her stolen cards and car, stashing her body on a couch for days and finally dumping her body in the woods - was heinous, and worse. Another statutory aggravator listed by prosecutors is that at 84, she was especially vulnerable.

For anyone who has elderly loved ones living alone, the crime was a nightmare in the flesh. The fact that it happened in the quiet, established, tree-lined Palmora Park neighborhood in Leesburg, made it even more disturbing.

These factors, and a surprising twist in the case, have defense and prosecuting attorneys worried about pretrial publicity.

"We're going to have individual voir dire," Executive Assistant Public Defender John Spivey said, referring to the questioning of prospective jurors. "We're going to use 2 courtrooms." About 50 people will be in one courtroom while one potential juror will be 1-on-1 with attorneys in the other to see if they know anything about the case. The court sent out a letter to prospective jurors warning them not to listen, watch or read any news accounts about the case. If they pass that test, they will begin the lengthy process to see how they feel about the death penalty. People who are biased in either category will be excluded for cause. Then, the process begins to pick 12 jurors and a handful of alternates, with each side limited to the number of "strikes' they utilize.

The selection process could take 3 days, Spivey said.

The twist in the case that has generated a lot of news coverage in the Daily Commercial was Circuit Judge Don Briggs' suppression of a portion of Mariotti's confession.

Spivey successfully argued that detectives were misstating the law, including the penalties.

?...there are people who, like go to jail for manslaughter, they get 5 years, you know," Detective James Dunagan said, misrepresenting the importance of intent.M

"Hey, if they offered me 5 years for killing somebody, I'd take it, too," Spivey said. In fact, people can be charged with felony murder, even if they are not the one who pulled the trigger, if someone dies during the commission of a felony.

The judge ruled that jurors can still hear about Mariotti being in the house when she was killed, and in helping hide her body.

That help allegedly came from his companion, Tracie Jo Naffziger. She will testify against Mariotti.

Both sides have lined up insect experts to estimate the time of death, based on evidence found on the couch. If it goes to the penalty phase, both sides will present mental health experts.

New laws require juries to be unanimous in their death penalty recommendations, which makes it harder for prosecutors to get a death sentence.

Assistant State Attorney Rich Buxman, who will be handling the case for the state, declined to comment for this story.

(source: Daily Commercial)








ALABAMA----impending execution

Alabama Gives Walter Moody Execution Date of April 19, 2018



Walter Leroy Moody, Jr., is scheduled to be executed at 6 pm CDT, on Thursday, April 19, 2018, at the Holeman Correctional Facility in Atmore, Alabama. 83-year-old Walter is convicted of the murder of 58-year-old US Circuit Judge Robert Smith Vance on December 16, 1989, in Alabama, and civil rights attorney Robert E. Robinson on December 18, 1989, in Georgia. Walter has spent the last 20 years of his life on Alabama's death row.

In 1972, Walter Moody was convicted of possessing a pipe bomb and, when it exploded, injuring his wife. He served 3 years in a federal prison before being released. In 1985, Moody wanted to have his conviction overturned and, to that end, bribed Julie Linn-West, an acquaintance, to say that she personally knew someone else had placed the bomb in Moody's home in 1972. Julie's mother, Susan Eckstrom would also become part of the scheme by agreeing to testify that Moody was innocent.

Moody's attempts to have his conviction overturned were unsuccessful, as the District Court for the Middle District of Georgia denied his petition and was later affirmed by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals.

In 1990, he learned that his connection to Julie and Susan was being investigated. Moody attempted to continue to bribe Julie, and threatened to harm her mother, Susan, if Julie were to cooperate with law enforcement. Julie, however, had already agreed to help the government and recorded many of the conversations that she had with Moody.

At the time, the government was also investigating Moody for the murder of Judge Robert Dance of the Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit and for the murder of Robert Robinson, a civil rights lawyer in Savannah, Georgia. Judge Dance was murdered in his home on December 16, 1989, when he opened a plainly wrapped, brown package. Inside was a pipe bomb filled with nails, which exploded, killing him instantly and severely injuring his wife, Helen. Two days later, on December 18, 1989, Robert Robinson was killed in nearly identical circumstances in his home in Savannah, Georgia. In the following days, 2 other bombs were discovered and defused - one in Georgia and one in Florida. The pipe bombs were linked to the one for which Moody had previously been imprisoned, and which conviction he was fighting.

Moody was arrested for the murders in 1991. He was 1st tried in federal court for the murder of Robert Robinson, where Moody received seven consecutive life without parole sentences. He was then tried in Alabama for the murder of Judge Robert Vance, where he was sentenced to death.

Please pray for peace and healing for the families of Robert Vance and Robert Robinson. Please pray for strength for the family of Walter Moody. Please pray that if Walter is innocent, lacks the competency to be executed, or should not be executed for any other reason, that evidence will be presented prior to his execution. Please pray that Walter may come to find peace through a personal relationship with Jesus Christ, if he has not already.

(source: theforgivenessfoundation.org)

******************

Man connvicted in 20-month-old stepdaughter's death



A man convicted in the 2015 death of his stepdaughter in Alabama could be sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

The Mobile County District Attorney's Office tells news outlets a jury recommended the sentence for 27-year-old Christopher Knapp on Thursday. He was found guilty of capital murder on Tuesday in the death of 20-month-old Dakota Burke Everett.

County sheriff's Sgt. James Riddick testified in February 2015 the child was hospitalized with a skull fracture, hemorrhaging in both eyes, a broken clavicle, burns and other injuries.

The DA's office says a judge will consider the jury's recommendation but Knapp could still get the death penalty. The DA's office tweeted formal sentencing for Knapp is May 22. The toddler's mother, Summer Everett, is also charged with capital murder.

(source: Associated Press)








OHIO:

Penalty phase to get under way in James D. Worley trial



The jury that convicted James D. Worley for the kidnapping and aggravated murder of 20-year-old Sierah Joughin will decide this week if he spends the rest of his life in prison or is put to death.

On Monday the case enters the penalty phase, which is expected to last several days. Prosecutors will call witnesses to testify to the "aggravating circumstances" related to the case, while the defense will call witnesses to provide "mitigating factors," or reasons why Worley should not be given a death sentence.

Worley, 58, was convicted Tuesday of 2 counts each of aggravated murder with death penalty specifications, murder, abduction, felonious assault, and having weapons under disability; 4 counts of kidnapping, and 1 count each of possession of criminal tools, gross abuse of a corpse, and tampering with evidence.

Mitigation testimony could include information about a defendant's upbringing and background, mental capacity, substance abuse issues - anything that could serve to humanize the defendant and mitigate the call for the death penalty.

"You will need to make a determination as to whether or not the state has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the aggravating factors outweigh any mitigating factors," Fulton County Common Pleas Judge Jeffrey Robinson told jurors after they returned the guilty verdicts. "If you do so, you will be required to give the death sentence to the defendant."

If not, they can sentence him to life in prison without possibility of parole, or life with the possibility of parole after 25 or 30 years, he said. It is the only time in Ohio courts where a jury recommends the sentence, which must be unanimous and ultimately will be imposed by the judge.

Ms. Joughin's uncle, Howard Ice, spoke on behalf of the family after the verdict and said they were thankful the jury found Worley guilty on all counts.

"Our hope through this painful process was to find justice for Sierah," he said. "Justice for her abduction and murder, justice for our family, justice for the amazing community that so many of us live in."

Attorneys for both the prosecution and the defense declined to comment after the verdict.

In late March, a Franklin County jury recommended Brian Golsby get life in prison without parole after he was convicted of kidnapping, raping, and murdering Ohio State student and Anthony Wayne High School graduate Reagan Tokes in 2017.

The penalty phase in the Worley trial begins at 9 a.m. Monday.

(source: The Toledo Blade)








USA:

What to do with the elderly & dying on death row



The Supreme Court recently agreed to hear the case of a 67-year old death row inmate whose dementia prevents him from remembering the crime that sentenced him to death, the New York Times reports.

Why it matters: The Supreme Court has already ruled against the execution of juveniles and the mentally ill, and now looks at the legality of executing the elderly. Long legal processes and a lack of access to lethal drugs has drawn out the time between sentencing and executions. By the time there's an execution date, some prisons have found difficulty locating suitable veins in aging inmates to inject the deadly chemicals. In many states, death row inmates are more likely to die from natural causes than execution, according to the Times.

(source: axios.com)

_______________________________________________
A service courtesy of Washburn University School of Law www.washburnlaw.edu

DeathPenalty mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty
Unsubscribe: http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/options/deathpenalty

Reply via email to