September 21



TENNESSEE:

State will seek death penalty against Chad Benfield



A man charged with the murder of an 89-year-old woman who was his neighbor will be facing the death penalty when he goes on trial.

First Judicial District Attorney General Ken Baldwin filed a motion in Carter County Criminal Court on Sept. 6, which gave notice of the state's intention to seek the death penalty for Chad Benfield, 44.

The state gave 4 reasons for the decision to seek the death penalty in the murder of Mary Nolen.

The state said the 1st reason was because "the murder was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel, in that it inolved torture or serious physical abuse beyond that necessary to produce death."

The state's 2nd reason was that the woman's death was "knowingly committed."

The 3rd reason was the victim's age of 89.

The 4th reason was that the slaying was committed "at random and the reasons for the killing are not obvious or easily understood."

Nolan was found badly injured at her Stoney Creek home by her daughter and granddaughter on July 14, 2017. Nolen was transported to Johnson City Medical Center, where she died on July 26.

According to the autopsy report, injuries were discovered to her skull and brain that indicated blunt force trauma, consistent with injuries received during a physical assault. Additionally, bruising was still evident and present on the tops of both of Nolen's forearms, along with contusions to her face, scalp, chin and neck.

In response to the state's motion, Wesley Taylor, the assistant public defender for Benfield, has filed a motion seeking to have the schedule for the trial continued to prepare for the more complex nature of a capital murder trial. Taylor also filed to have additional counsel appointed.

The next motion hearing for Benfield is scheduled for Oct. 17.

(source: Johnson City Press)








KENTUCKY:

Attorneys for three charged in Logan slaying want separate trials



The prosecutor in a case in which 3 men are accused of murder and other offenses in the death of a Logan County woman has requested that the men be tried together.

Justin Crocker, acting commonwealth's attorney for Logan and Todd counties, filed a motion to have the cases of Demetrius Roberson, Tayveon Bibb and Deon Young joined at 1 trial.

Roberson, Bibb and Young are each charged with murder and 1st-degree robbery. The charges stem from the Aug. 21, 2016, death of Lexus Bell, 21, who was shot at her Russellville apartment.

Crocker is seeking the death penalty for Roberson, who is accused of firing the fatal shots and has also been charged with attempted murder and nine counts of 1st-degree wanton endangerment.

Young is also charged with 10 counts of 1st-degree wanton endangerment.

The men's cases came up for review Wednesday in Logan Circuit Court. During the hearing, Crocker argued that trying the 3 men before the same jury would not be unfair to the defendants.

"The commonwealth does contend that each of the defendants participated in the same series of acts that led to the charges they each have," Crocker said.

Attorneys for the 3 defendants filed objections to Crocker's motion and elaborated on their arguments Wednesday.

Public defender Robin Irwin, who represents Bibb, said a separate jury should weigh the evidence in his client's case than one that would be qualified to consider the death penalty should Roberson be convicted.

"There's a big distinction between the allegations against Mr. Roberson and Mr. Bibb," Irwin said, adding that evidence suggests Bibb did not have a weapon at the time of the incident and was not at the scene of the crime.

Young's attorney, Alan Simpson, also sought a separate trial for his client, arguing in a response to Crocker's motion filed Tuesday that statements Bibb made to police implicating Young would not be admissible at Young's trial.

Bibb reportedly claimed during a police interview that he was told by Roberson that Young participated in the incident.

"With this being Mr. Bibb's proposed testimony, there is absolutely no reason why these cases should be tried together, as Mr. Bibb's statements toward Mr. Young are nothing but hearsay," Simpson said in his response.

Logan Circuit Judge Tyler Gill said he would rule on the matter within a month.

The cases against each man are currently set for a July 8 trial.

Also Wednesday, Gill scheduled a Nov. 13 bond hearing for Roberson, who is serving a prison sentence for an unrelated offense.

Roberson's attorney, Michael Bufkin, said his client will meet with the parole board in December, and he wants to have a hearing to modify the $1 million bond set by Gill in the murder case before going up for parole.

Gill also granted a motion by Bufkin requiring the state to provide evidence in the criminal case against Crocker's predecessor, Gail Guiling, who is under indictment on charges of official misconduct, tampering with physical evidence and engaging in organized crime.

Bufkin's motion noted that Guiling was the commonwealth's attorney at the time police were investigating Bell's death and that the investigation overlapped in time with the events that led to Guiling's indictment.

Bufkin sought the evidence supporting charges against Guiling in an effort to investigate whether Guiling, who still holds the commonwealth's attorney position but is not running for re-election, committed official misconduct while Roberson's case has been pending.

(source: Bowling Green Daily News)








NEBRASKA:

Ex-Doctor Sentenced to Death for Revenge Killing of 4 People in Nebraska



A former Creighton University medical resident linked to 2 separate attacks that killed 4 people in Nebraska has been sentenced to death.

Judges had the option to send Garcia to prison for life but ultimately decided on the death penalty after he murdered 4 people.

A former doctor was sentenced to death on Friday by a three-judge panel in Nebraska after being convicted of murdering 4 people in 2 separate incidents.

Anthony Garcia, 45, was found guilty in the attacks that took place 5 years apart from each other, reports AP.

The murders were Garcia's revenge on 2 doctors - William Hunter and Roger Brumback - for firing Garcia from his residency program at Creighton University of Medicine in Omaha, Neb., in 2001. Prosecutors say Garcia blamed the doctors for his firing, as well as for him being unable to get accepted into other programs or get his medical license approved in other states.

In 2008, Garcia entered the Hunter home in Omaha where he fatally stabbed their 11-year-old son, Thomas. He also killed the family's housekeeper Shirlee Sherman by stabbing her to death.

Police were unable to find any suspects for the murders and the case went unsolved for years.

That changed after the 2013 murders of Brunmback and his wife Mary, at their home in Omaha. The doctor was shot in the doorway of his home and then stabbed. His wife was stabbed to death, much like the stabbings in 2008, according to investigators.

Police recognized the similarities of the 2 attacks, and once the connections with Creighton University were made, Garcia was flagged.

Substantial amounts of evidence were presented by prosecutors to tie Garcia to the murders, including cellphone and credit card records that placed Garcia in Omaha the day the Brumbacks were murdered.

The Garcia family, as well as family members of the victims, were in court when the ruling was made. Fernando Garcia, Anthony's brother, said he could not imagine his brother committing the crimes.

"We just want the victims' families to know we do pray for them. We feel their pain," he said.

Jeff Sherman, son of Shirlee who was stabbed in 2008 said, "I'm left with constant images from courtroom pictures of what happened to my mom. I can't get those images out of my head."

The panel had the option to sentence Garcia to life in prison but ultimately decided on the death penalty.

There has not been an execution of an inmate in Nebraska in more than 20 years until last month. The state's mode of execution remains unknown due to legal challenges that have made it difficult to obtain the drugs needed for lethal injection.

Under Nebraska law, Garcia's sentence will automatically be appealed.

(source: campussafetymagazine.com)

*****************

Boswell's attorney: death penalty is 'unconstitutional'



Bailey Boswell appeared in Saline County Court Sept. 17 in connection with 1st-degree murder charges in the death of Sydney Loofe, a Lincoln woman who was killed in November.

The state is seeking the death penalty for Boswell and Aubrey Trail. Both were charged June 11 with Loofe's murder, as well as improper disposal of skeletal remains - also a felony.

Boswell's attorney, Todd Lancaster, argued Sept. 17 that Nebraska's state laws regarding capital punishment are unconstitutional, citing "cruel and unusual punishment for the state."

After a short hearing, judge Vicky Johnson took the matter under review for further advisement. She gave the prosecutors in the case until Oct. 1 to give a written response.

Boswell has not yet entered a plea in court.

(source: The Seward Independent)








OKLAHOMA:

Prosecutors seek death penalty in Oklahoma case involving dead baby



We have updated information regarding a 31-year-old Oklahoma City man accused of killing his 7-month-old son and leaving the body in a trash can.

Court records show prosecutors are seeking the death penalty in their case against Victor Minjarez.

Newsok.com reports Minjarez maintains his son died from being laid too close to a heater. However, investigators state the baby suffered blunt force trauma to the head, brain bleeding and a skull fracture.

Minjarez has admitted to bagging up his baby after watching his son take his last breath.

(source: KRMG news)








CALIFORNIA:

Reward increased to $100,000 to find Newport Beach fugitive



The reward to find a Newport Beach man accused of killing his wife and leaving her body in San Diego County was increased Wednesday to $100,000.

U.S. Marshals put Peter Chadwick on their 15 Most Wanted List in 2012 after the death of his wife.

Quee Chadwick was reported missing on October 10, 2012, after she failed to pick up her 3 children from school. Investigators found blood and signs of a struggle in the couple's home. They believe the couple fought and Chadwick strangled his wife to death.

Chadwick called San Diego Police the next day as he was driving on I-905, claiming another man killed his wife and forced him to drive south with her body. Officers arrested him near the U.S.-Mexico border.

Quee Chadwick's body was found about 1 week later in a trash bin along Wildcat Canyon Road in Lakeside.

Chadwick was charged with murder, including a special circumstance allegation of killing for financial gain, which makes him eligible for the death penalty or life in prison without parole.

Investigators said the couple was discussing a divorce.

Initially, Chadwick, a real estate investor, moved to his father's home in Santa Barbara as he awaited trial, according to OC Weekly. He fled in 2015, investigators said.

A court document indicated Chadwick studied manuals on how to live off the grid, withdrew millions of dollars from his accounts, and told one of his sons he planned to escape to Canada or Mexico, according to the OC Weekly.

(source: KGTV news)








USA:

Does Risk of Racial Bias Make a Death Sentence Unconstitutional?----'Jones v. Oklahoma' presents a key chance for the U.S. Supreme Court to address racism in the criminal justice system and in application of Oklahoma's death penalty.



The U.S. Supreme Court, this term, will conference an extraordinary case, Jones v. Oklahoma, that asks a "big question" on racial bias and death sentencing in Oklahoma. If the risk of racial bias in Oklahoma can be statistically proven, does that make a death sentence unconstitutional? The high court previously found that racial bias is a "constitutionally impermissible" factor in death sentencing.

Julius Jones was an honors student and a college athlete when he says he was wrongfully convicted and sentenced to death because of unreliable informant witnesses and inherent racial bias in the Oklahoma criminal justice system. Jones has 2 important sources of evidence that racism impacted his case. First, there are multiple, direct examples of racial bias in his case, including a juror who used the "n-word" about him. His attorneys also cite a 22-year, 1st-of-its kind statistical analysis of all capital sentences in Oklahoma. The results are conclusive.

The researchers who authored "Race and Death Sentencing for Oklahoma Homicides 1990-2012" studied sentencing for every homicide that occurred in Oklahoma from Jan. 1, 1990 through Dec. 31, 2012. Correcting for multiple factors, the study found that a black defendant like Jones, accused of killing a white male victim in Oklahoma, is nearly three times more likely to receive a death sentence than if his victim were a nonwhite male. (Study at 747.)

Looking at every homicide and resulting penalty across more than 2 decades in Oklahoma, the researchers found that only 1.88 % of homicides involving nonwhite victims result in a capital sentence. When the victim is white, that number more than doubles to 3.92 of all homicides leading to a death penalty decision. It's extremely troubling to think that a crime with a white victim is twice as likely to end in a death sentence than a crime with a black victim, and casts serious doubt on the fairness, reliability and objectivity of capital punishment, argue attorneys for Mr. Jones.

Apart from larger sentencing trends, Jones' case contains multiple specific examples of racism. One of the most disturbing instances has never been considered by any court. A juror stated that another juror said, during court proceedings, that the trial was a waste of time and "they should just take the (n-word) out and shoot him behind the jail." Another juror was concerned and told the trial judge. The Judge took no action.

Decision makers in Jones' case also repeatedly used racially charged and coded language to present Jones as embodying "black dangerousness," using dehumanizing words like "thug," "prowl," and "drugs," despite the fact that there was no evidence of the case being drug-related. Jones and his family have always maintained his innocence and that he was at home eating spaghetti with the family when the tragic crime occurred. The state's star witnesses against Jones were an informant and the co-defendant, who admitted they were involved in the crime. One wasn't charged with the murder and the other got out after 15 years. Jones awaits his execution. The jury never heard the full extent of the deals that these witnesses and another informant received for testifying against Jones.

The only eyewitness to the crime saw a half-inch to an inch of hair sticking out of a hat on the shooter's head, but photos prove Jones had short-cropped hair at the time of the crime. Jones's appearance was documented in an official government photograph taken a week before the crime. However, one of the state's star witnesses, who admitted to being in the shooter's car at the time of the shooting, matched that description.

In his petition to the Supreme Court, attorneys for Jones argue that racial prejudice played an unconstitutional role in Jones' case. They argue that there is reasonable doubt about Jones' guilt, but that the inherent racial bias in Oklahoma's capital sentencing scheme, as proven by the study, prevented that reasonable doubt from determining the outcome of the case.

Jones v. Oklahoma presents an important opportunity for the court to address racism in the criminal justice system and in application of Oklahoma's death penalty head-on. The court should insist, at the very least, that Jones receives a hearing where all the evidence, including that of racial bias, can be heard. Fairness requires it.

(source: Commentary; Gerald Kogan was the assistant state attorney and chief prosecutor in the Dade County, Florida State Attorney's Office and served as the chief justice of the Florida Supreme Court from 1996 until his retirement in 1998----The National Law Journal)

_______________________________________________
A service courtesy of Washburn University School of Law www.washburnlaw.edu

DeathPenalty mailing list
DeathPenalty@lists.washlaw.edu
http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/listinfo/deathpenalty
Unsubscribe: http://lists.washlaw.edu/mailman/options/deathpenalty

Reply via email to