Hi! * Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060602 05:47]: > > This email reminds me that there is something that has nagged me at all the > > debconfs I have been: a tendency to conflate and morph BOFs into talks. > This seems to largely be an artifact of the DebConf organizing team's > decision to automatically demote any talks not approved by the speaker > committee to BoF status; so many talk proposals were given BoF slots and > represented as BoFs, with responsibles arriving with the intention of giving > talks.
Small correction: Yes, we did that last year. This year we rejected talks not accepted by the commitee, but left the possibility to propose a BoF instead. We hoped that proposed BoFs will be real BoFs. Well, let's think about it till next year. Yours sincerely, Alexander
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
