Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > This thread is just too long. At the time of writing, I see four posts in this thread. Yes, maybe that's four too many: no-one should have to ask the team not to hide problems behind oblique announcements.
> How about letting this thing die? There is > no message since days that had anything useful, it looks like flaming > for flaming fun, nothing that gets anything anywhere anymore. This thing apparently won't die by ignoring it. Ever heard the expression "nature abhors a vacuum"? I feel the debconf organisation team can help by leading and plugging the gap. > We were there, we know what happened, we had the decision taken in the > orga team (and then DAMs) and I dont see a reason to change it. Stop the > mailing, go to work or to drink or to whatever you like. I wasn't there, I didn't see what happened or how you made the decision in the orga team, but, from the data I've collected, I don't understand why the organisers want to hide and prolong the agony. I've sent a handful of emails on this. Me stopping mailing won't stop the discussion any time soon, but you mailing a few might. I humbly suggest the Communication mini-HOWTOs mentioned at debconf: http://people.debian.org/~enrico/dcg/ch02s05.html Anyway, there's the request - the team answer is up to the team. > Note: Thats my personal option, nothing from any official position I may > have for a random reason! Noted. Likewise, -- MJR/slef Laux nur mia opinio: vidu http://people.debian.org/~mjr/ Bv sekvu http://www.uk.debian.org/MailingLists/#codeofconduct _______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
