Hey, On Sunday 11 June 2006 09:35, Steve Langasek wrote: > I didn't make any assumptions here, it was Holger who posted suggesting > that one of the differences between talks and presentations for next year > might be sponsorship. (I assumed that he meant *prioritization* of > sponsorship, though he didn't say.)
I think so. (I was not part of the sponsorship team, so I can only guess from
what I heard. And when we talked on irc about those four types, we only
talked about "sponsorship" not about "prioritization of sponsorship" though
this could be, what stockholm, for the sponsorship-team, had in mind. (It was
a discussion on irc, where abbreviations are used frequently.)
I probably wouldnt write this mail now, if I hadnt had a new idea to bring
this discussion forward, so hear it is: for next year we should come up with
a list of things, that are required for sponsorship and another which tells,
what increases the chances to get sponsorship (involvement in debian, giving
a talk, paying 10% of the sum, whatever).
This will also help to make the decision, who get's sponsorship easier and
more objective, (besides saving the sponsorship team from accusations...)
regards,
Holger
pgpTFlI1g51XQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
