Manoj Srivastava wrote: > > No, valid for any standard level of trust you are able/allowed to > > apply on the matter. > > I am still confused. What standard? And who is this "you" being > referred to? What matter are you talking about, now? (this seems like a > new term not in the original statement). > > I must be very obtuse. I think we are talking about signing gpg > keys. And I _think_ you are talking about standards of trust some > "You" is either able to apply, or is "allowed" to apply. I don't know > who this you is, and I don't know of any standards body that can tell > people what standard leel of trust (whatever that means) an individual > is allowed to apply on "the matter". > > Anyway, if you think I am too dumb to understand what you are > talking about, we can stop here. But as it stands, I have no idea what > you are saying here.
I don't think you are dumb what I'm talking about, at least, I don't consider you more dumb than what you already consider people attending big KSPs. -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/ La gente de arriba te detesta.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
