Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 07:39:18PM +0300: >Hello Anibal, > >I have just downloaded the files you mentioned on the debconf7 ksp >page aand observed that, although you said that you would sign with >the key 1880283C, instead you signed with an alternate one. Did I >misunderstood something?
Not at all! >$ gpg --verify ksp-dc7.txt.sha256.asc >gpg: Signature made Lu 11 iun 2007 12:42:37 +0300 EEST using DSA key ID >73CDA455 Look at the previous line: "using DSA key ID 73CDA455". >gpg: Good signature from "Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" >gpg: aka "Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" >gpg: aka "Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" >gpg: aka "Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" > > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/var/cache/ksp/debconf7 $ gpg --list-key Anibal >pub 1024D/1880283C 2002-09-15 >uid Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >uid Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >uid Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >uid Anibal Monsalve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >sub 1024g/F607D9A1 2002-09-15 >sub 1024D/73CDA455 2002-09-16 And compare with the previous line: "sub 1024D/73CDA455 2002-09-16" That means that 73CDA455 was used to sign ksp-dc7.txt.sha256 and it is a subkey of 1880283C which is perfectly okay. Thank you for the question. I'm replying here because it may be of interest to someone else. Best Regards, Aníbal Monsalve Salazar -- http://v7w.com/anibal
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Debconf-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.debconf.org/mailman/listinfo/debconf-discuss
